Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pls support Pinecone Retriever #379

Open
SeanJAmmirati opened this issue Mar 6, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Pls support Pinecone Retriever #379

SeanJAmmirati opened this issue Mar 6, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@SeanJAmmirati
Copy link

We have checked your research assistant and it does a great job searching the web. However, we also would also like to have agents search across our Pinecone vector store.

From your blog post: https://blog.langchain.dev/exploring-uxs-besides-chat-with-research-assistant/
"It can equally easily be pointed to a vectorstore containing your relevant information."

But not sure when this will be done from your roadmap or if I'm just missing how to configure this. Any advice would be welcome.

@djuillard
Copy link

Hi, I have worked as well on this repo and the architecture, the sequencing are really smart.... and results are indeed very great -> impressive work.
I also support @SeanJAmmirati request because in a market study for instance, it can make sense to add proprietary document into the global search in parallel to internet sources. Thanks

@SomethingGoodLLC
Copy link

SomethingGoodLLC commented Apr 4, 2024 via email

@SeanJAmmirati
Copy link
Author

Because, those proprietary documentation (or even just specialized knowledge that may not be confidential) could be made accessible via searches against pinecone.

How would PineCone help? On Apr 4, 2024, at 05:17, djuillard @.> wrote:  Hi, I have worked as well on this repo and the architecture, the sequencing are really smart.... and results are indeed very great -> impressive work. I also support @SeanJAmmiratihttps://github.com/SeanJAmmirati request because in a market study for instance, it can make sense to add proprietary document into the global search in parallel to internet sources. Thanks — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#379 (comment)>, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AX7AYIUQX5EENBPBK2LZUBTY3ULD7AVCNFSM6AAAAABEJE4V3GVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAMZWGYZTCMJYHA. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.>

@SeanJAmmirati
Copy link
Author

Does my explanation make sense? Any update on this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants