From 35a988b3180ae0136ad8d700d1cde9ef8d85aa04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jammy2211 Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 23:27:05 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] autofit_inference: B5c correlated_nd pilot run line (RAL 409957) and Now Run line via cortex.py run (open); Now rewritten via cortex.py now; dashboard re-rendered with --cortex on this worktree. cortex.py check OK. Refs PyAutoLabs/autofit_inference#14 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 --- dashboard.html | 516 ++++++++++++++++++------------ dashboard.md | 569 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ projects/autofit_inference.md | 4 +- state.json | 2 +- 4 files changed, 690 insertions(+), 401 deletions(-) diff --git a/dashboard.html b/dashboard.html index cb8af80..4409b0e 100644 --- a/dashboard.html +++ b/dashboard.html @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ p>.board-source-link{order:1;margin-left:auto} .board-section>summary>.board-source-link{margin-left:auto} .boards a[data-organ="broca"]{color:#8b3e68}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){.boards a[data-organ="broca"]{color:#f4a5ce}}.boards a[data-organ="brain"]{color:#2159c9}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){.boards a[data-organ="brain"]{color:#6f9dff}}.boards a[data-organ="mind"]{color:#0a7d72}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){.boards a[data-organ="mind"]{color:#2ee6cf}}.boards a[data-organ="cortex"]{color:#a5177d}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){.boards a[data-organ="cortex"]{color:#ff7ad9}}.boards a[data-organ="memory"]{color:#6b34d6}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){.boards a[data-organ="memory"]{color:#b37eff}}.boards a[data-organ="eyes"]{color:#7d6300}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){.boards a[data-organ="eyes"]{color:#f5c518}}.boards a[data-organ="ears"]{color:#96520b}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){.boards a[data-organ="ears"]{color:#ffc078}}.boards a[data-organ="heart"]{color:#b50f1a}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){.boards a[data-organ="heart"]{color:#ff6b73}}.boards a[data-organ="hands"]{color:#9a5400}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){.boards a[data-organ="hands"]{color:#ffa733}}.boards a[data-organ="pulse"]{color:#0b7a4b}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){.boards a[data-organ="pulse"]{color:#34d399}}.boards a[data-organ="insight"]{color:#995500}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){.boards a[data-organ="insight"]{color:#ffc163}}.boards a[data-organ="dna"]{color:#087b88}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){.boards a[data-organ="dna"]{color:#67e8f9}}.boards a[data-organ="nerves"]{color:#6420e0}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){.boards a[data-organ="nerves"]{color:#a27aff}}.boards a[data-organ="gut"]{color:#3f7a00}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){.boards a[data-organ="gut"]{color:#8fe01a}}.boards a[data-organ="organism"]{color:#0b6fa4}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){.boards a[data-organ="organism"]{color:#5ec7f5}} -.fresh{padding:.1rem .9rem;margin:1.2rem 0;background:var(--tint)}.fresh p{margin:.5rem 0}table.map{width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:.95em}table.map th{text-align:left;color:var(--muted);font-weight:600}table.map td,table.map th{border-bottom:1px solid var(--line);padding:.4rem .5rem .4rem 0;vertical-align:top}.project h3{font-size:1.35rem;font-weight:700;padding-bottom:.2rem;border-bottom:2px solid var(--accent);letter-spacing:.01em;margin-top:1.6rem}.pathchip{display:inline-block;background:var(--accent);color:#fff;font-family:ui-monospace,SFMono-Regular,Menlo,monospace;font-size:.88em;padding:.12em .5em;border-radius:.3rem;overflow-wrap:anywhere}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){.pathchip{background:color-mix(in srgb,var(--accent) 55%,#000)}}.stale{color:var(--bad);font-weight:600} +.fresh{padding:.1rem .9rem;margin:1.2rem 0;background:var(--tint)}.fresh p{margin:.5rem 0}table.map{width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:.95em}table.map th{text-align:left;color:var(--muted);font-weight:600}table.map td,table.map th{border-bottom:1px solid var(--line);padding:.4rem .5rem .4rem 0;vertical-align:top}details.project{margin:.6rem 0;border:1px solid var(--line);border-radius:10px;padding:0}details.project>summary{display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;align-items:baseline;gap:.2rem .7rem;padding:.75rem 1rem;min-height:48px;list-style:none;color:var(--fg);font-weight:400}details.project>summary::-webkit-details-marker{display:none}details.project>summary::before{content:"▸";color:var(--accent);flex:none}details.project[open]>summary::before{content:"▾"}details.project>summary:focus-visible,details.full>summary:focus-visible,details.sub>summary:focus-visible{outline:3px solid var(--accent);outline-offset:2px}details.project>summary h3{display:inline;margin:0;padding:0;border:0;font-size:1.1rem;font-weight:700}details.project .purpose{flex:1 1 18rem;min-width:0}details.project .meta{color:var(--muted);font-size:.88em;font-variant-numeric:tabular-nums}.project-body{padding:0 1rem .8rem;border-top:1px solid var(--line)}.project-body h4{margin:1rem 0 .4rem;font-size:1rem}table.runs{width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:.92em}table.runs th{text-align:left;color:var(--muted);font-weight:600;white-space:nowrap;overflow-wrap:normal}table.runs td,table.runs th{border-bottom:1px solid var(--line);padding:.35rem .7rem .35rem 0;vertical-align:top}table.runs td.job,table.runs td.date,table.runs td.part,table.runs td.state{white-space:nowrap;font-variant-numeric:tabular-nums}table.runs td.what{width:100%}details.full,details.sub{margin:0}details.full>summary{font-weight:400;color:inherit;padding:0}details.full>summary .less{display:none;color:var(--muted)}details.full[open]>summary .clip{display:none}details.full[open]>summary .less{display:inline}details.full>p{margin:.2rem 0 0}details.sub{margin:.6rem 0}ul.log{margin:.3rem 0;padding-left:1.2rem}dl.where{display:grid;grid-template-columns:max-content minmax(0,1fr);gap:.3rem .8rem;margin:1rem 0;color:var(--accent)}dl.where dd{margin:0;min-width:0}.position{display:flex;align-items:flex-start;gap:.8rem}.position-text{flex:1;min-width:0}.position-text h4{margin-top:.3rem}.position .resume{flex:none;min-width:44px;min-height:44px;margin-top:.2rem}table.runs td.what{line-height:1.6}@media(max-width:34rem){table.runs,table.runs tbody{display:block}table.runs thead{position:absolute;width:1px;height:1px;overflow:hidden;clip:rect(0 0 0 0)}table.runs tr{display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;align-items:baseline;gap:0 .6rem;padding:.5rem 0;border-bottom:1px solid var(--line)}table.runs td{display:block;border:0;padding:0}table.runs td[data-label]::before{content:attr(data-label) ": ";color:var(--muted);font-size:.85em}table.runs td.what{flex:1 0 100%;margin-top:.15rem}}.pathchip{display:inline-block;background:var(--accent);color:#fff;font-family:ui-monospace,SFMono-Regular,Menlo,monospace;font-size:.88em;padding:.12em .5em;border-radius:.3rem;overflow-wrap:anywhere}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){.pathchip{background:color-mix(in srgb,var(--accent) 55%,#000)}}.stale{color:var(--bad);font-weight:600}

PyAutoCortexScience

Question. Run. Rule.

Explore science with your Cortex

Read the prompt
Last updated 2026-10-15 18:12:20 UTC
↻ Update

- +- Open autofit_inference: https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/autofit_inference
Last updated 2026-10-15 22:26:42 UTC
↻ Update

+

-

Summary

22 Running · 47 Open
+

Summary

22 Running · 48 Open
@@ -346,255 +346,359 @@ - +
ProjectRunningOpenLast update
subhalo_validation052026-09-07
slope_hierarchy_scale002026-10-14
ic50_workspace002026-10-14
autolens_inference602026-09-24
autofit_inference002026-10-15
autofit_inference012026-10-15

Projects

9
-
-

subhalo_validation — Do the SLaM subhalo pipelines false-detect on lenses with no subhalo

-

active · ral · subhalo_validation#2 · projects/subhalo_validation.md · local /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/subhalo_validation · RAL /mnt/ral/jnightin/active/subhalo_validation

-

Now

-

Five chains on RAL under the corrected adapt settings: rectangular_adapt on pl_eff_0 / pl_eff_1_outer (job A done, job B 342311 submitted) and the delaunay_adapt_split reruns plus rectangular_adapt on pl_sersic_0. pl_sersic_0 on delaunay_adapt_split is accepted (no false detection, +2.557).
Next: pull when the numba chains land and read the evidence_increase of each; no more 1000-pixel runs.

-

Runs

-
    -
  • 342299_1 — open — ral — 2026-09-07 — delaunay_adapt_split_pl_eff_0: job B, numba chain at the standard 1250-pixel Delaunay mesh (8c / 96gb / 48 h); reloads job A 342231_1; the 09-07 ruling: run al…
    • -
  • 342299_2 — open — ral — 2026-09-07 — delaunay_adapt_split_pl_eff_1_outer: job B, numba chain at the standard 1250-pixel Delaunay mesh (8c / 96gb / 48 h); reloads job A 342231_2; the 09-07 ruling:…
    • -
  • 342311_1 — open — ral — 2026-09-07 — rectangular_adapt_pl_eff_0: job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt; reloads job A 342237_1; the…
    • -
  • 342311_2 — open — ral — 2026-09-07 — rectangular_adapt_pl_eff_1_outer: job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt; reloads job A 342237_…
    • -
  • 342311_0 — open — ral — 2026-09-07 — rectangular_adapt_pl_sersic_0: job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt; reloads job A 342237_0;…
    • -
-

Last 5

-
    -
  • 2026-09-07 — result — accepted delaunay_adapt_split_pl_sersic_0 (R-20260907-01): Accepted. The numba delaunay_adapt_split chain on pl_sersic_0 (job 342273_0, 22 h 08 m, 1250 Hilbert / 1310 Delaunay pixels) lands evidence_increase +2.557 (< 5): no false detectio…
    • +
    +

    subhalo_validation

    Do the SLaM subhalo pipelines false-detect on lenses with no subhalo0 running · 5 open · updated 2026-09-07     +
    +
    +
    Registered:
    not recorded
    +
    Local:
    /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/subhalo_validation
    +
    RAL:
    /mnt/ral/jnightin/active/subhalo_validation
    +
    +

    Current position

    +

    Five chains on RAL under the corrected adapt settings: rectangular_adapt on pl_eff_0 / pl_eff_1_outer (job A done, job B 342311 submitted) and the delaunay_adapt_split reruns plus rectangular_adapt on pl_sersic_0. pl_sersic_0 on delaunay_adapt_split is accepted (no false detection, +2.557).
    Next: pull when the numba chains land and read the evidence_increase of each; no more 1000-pixel runs.

    + +
    +

    Runs (5)

    + + + + + + + + + +
    JobStatePartitionDateDescription
    342299_1openral2026-09-07
    delaunay_adapt_split_pl_eff_0: job B, numba chain at the standard 1250-pixel Delaunay mesh (8c / 96gb / 48 h);
    reloads job A 342231_1;
    the 09-07 ruling: run al…    show less

    delaunay_adapt_split_pl_eff_0: job B, numba chain at the standard 1250-pixel Delaunay mesh (8c / 96gb / 48 h);
    reloads job A 342231_1;
    the 09-07 ruling: run all datasets at 1250, no more pix1000

    342299_2openral2026-09-07
    delaunay_adapt_split_pl_eff_1_outer: job B, numba chain at the standard 1250-pixel Delaunay mesh (8c / 96gb / 48 h);
    reloads job A 342231_2;
    the 09-07 ruling:…    show less

    delaunay_adapt_split_pl_eff_1_outer: job B, numba chain at the standard 1250-pixel Delaunay mesh (8c / 96gb / 48 h);
    reloads job A 342231_2;
    the 09-07 ruling: run all datasets at 1250, no more pix1000

    342311_1openral2026-09-07
    rectangular_adapt_pl_eff_0: job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt;
    reloads job A 342237_1;
    the…    show less

    rectangular_adapt_pl_eff_0: job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt;
    reloads job A 342237_1;
    the 09-07 ask: submit the rectangular runs too

    342311_2openral2026-09-07
    rectangular_adapt_pl_eff_1_outer: job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt;
    reloads job A 342237_…    show less

    rectangular_adapt_pl_eff_1_outer: job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt;
    reloads job A 342237_2;
    the 09-07 ask: submit the rectangular runs too

    342311_0openral2026-09-07
    rectangular_adapt_pl_sersic_0: job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt;
    reloads job A 342237_0;…    show less

    rectangular_adapt_pl_sersic_0: job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt;
    reloads job A 342237_0;
    the 09-07 ask: submit the rectangular runs too

    +
    Recent log — 5 of 40 entries +
      +
    • 2026-09-07 — result —
      accepted delaunay_adapt_split_pl_sersic_0 (R-20260907-01): Accepted. The numba delaunay_adapt_split chain on pl_sersic_0 (job 342273_0, 22 h 08 m, 1250 Hilbert / 1310 Delaunay pixels) lands evidence_increase +2.557 (< 5): no false detectio…show less

      accepted delaunay_adapt_split_pl_sersic_0 (R-20260907-01): Accepted. The numba delaunay_adapt_split chain on pl_sersic_0 (job 342273_0, 22 h 08 m, 1250 Hilbert / 1310 Delaunay pixels) lands evidence_increase +2.557 (< 5): no false detection. The best cell parks a 1.6e6 Msun nuisance subhalo at (-1.43, -2.36)", outside the ring. The shift from the legacy -0.30 comes with the S/N-3 adapt cap, adaptive over-sampling and the numba pool, not a code fault. Results are good; run the remaining datasets at 1250 pixels; no more 1000-pixel runs.

    • 2026-09-07 — run — 342311_0 submitted: rectangular_adapt_pl_sersic_0 — job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt; reloads job A 342237_0; the 09-07 ask: submit the rectangular runs too
    • 2026-09-07 — run — 342311_2 submitted: rectangular_adapt_pl_eff_1_outer — job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt; reloads job A 342237_2; the 09-07 ask: submit the rectangular runs too
    • 2026-09-07 — run — 342311_1 submitted: rectangular_adapt_pl_eff_0 — job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt; reloads job A 342237_1; the 09-07 ask: submit the rectangular runs too
    • 2026-09-07 — run — 342299_2 submitted: delaunay_adapt_split_pl_eff_1_outer — job B, numba chain at the standard 1250-pixel Delaunay mesh (8c / 96gb / 48 h); reloads job A 342231_2; the 09-07 ruling: run all datasets at 1250, no more pix1000

    full log

    -

    resume subhalo_validation

    -
-
-

subhalo — SLaM subhalo modelling of the SLACS lens sample

-

active · both · no issue yet · projects/subhalo.md · local /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/subhalo · RAL /mnt/ral/jnightin/active/subhalo

-

Now

-

Registered 2026-10-15 (PyAutoCortex#67): SLACS sample under dataset/, output/ empty, no runs yet; ral_root not yet created on RAL — the first hpc/sync push creates it.

-

Runs

+

active · ral · subhalo_validation#2

+
+
+
+
+

subhalo

SLaM subhalo modelling of the SLACS lens sampleno runs recorded · updated 2026-10-15 +
+
+
Registered:
2026-10-15
+
Local:
/mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/subhalo
+
RAL:
/mnt/ral/jnightin/active/subhalo
+
+

Current position

+

SLACS sample under dataset/, output/ empty, no runs yet; ral_root not yet created on RAL — the first hpc/sync push creates it.

+ +
+

Runs (0)

nothing on the cluster

-

Last 5

-
    +
    Recent log — 1 of 1 entry +
    • 2026-10-15 — note — ledger opened

    full log

    -

    resume subhalo

    - -
    -

    euclid_dr1 — Does the sep1 DR1 delivery reproduce the ten prelim lenses by eye

    -

    active · ral · no issue yet · projects/euclid_dr1.md · local /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/euclid_dr1 · RAL /mnt/ral/jnightin/euclid_dr1

    -

    Now

    -

    The top-1000 DR1 sep1 vis_lp array finished 971 of 1000; 29 hit the 18-hour walltime. Array 344645 is now running vis_pix with the Numba CPU sparse route for those 971 completed lenses only.

    -

    Runs

    -
      -
    • 342650 — open — ral — 2026-09-11 — euclid_dr1 sep1 reproduction: the ten euclid_dr1_prelim lenses refitted from the sep1 delivery through prelim's route (hpc/batch_cpu/submit_initial_lens_model_…
      • -
    • 345279 — running — ral — 2026-09-20 — VIS-LP JAX CPU pilot for the nine remainder tiles completing the first ten sorted DR1 lenses; single RGB thumbnails uploaded
      • -
    • 345305 — running — ral — 2026-09-20 — DR1 full vis_lp production batch 1/5: rest_01, 1000 lenses, output root dr1_full
      • -
    • 345669 — open — ral — 2026-09-20 — DR1 full vis_lp production batch 2/5: rest_02, 1000 lenses, output root dr1_full
      • -
    • 345670 — open — ral — 2026-09-20 — DR1 full vis_lp production batch 3/5: rest_03, 1000 lenses, output root dr1_full
      • -
    • 345671 — open — ral — 2026-09-20 — DR1 full vis_lp production batch 4/5: rest_04, 1000 lenses, output root dr1_full
      • -
    • 345672 — open — ral — 2026-09-20 — DR1 full vis_lp production batch 5/5: rest_05, 1000 lenses, output root dr1_full
      • -
    • 349353 — open — ral — 2026-09-21 — 100-tile dr1_sep1_rest SED array: Sersic VIS with lens-light n~Uniform(0.5,10.0), then NIR Y/J/H and EXT DECam g/r/i/z; output_sed; max 20 concurrent
      • -
    • 350581 — open — ral — 2026-09-23 — vis_lp-only inspection bundle over 4,912 completed dr1_sep1_rest tiles (vislp_full_20260923, OUTPUT_DIR=dr1_full, single 24 h CPU job)
      • -
    • 350804 — running — ral — 2026-09-25 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest priority-250 vis_lp array (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_prio250), 0-249, manifest hpc/run_manifests/positions_priority_250.txt, positions finder 2.1 pos…
      • -
    • 351085 — running — ral — 2026-09-25 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest next-5000 vis_lp batch 1/5 (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_n5k_p01), 1000 lenses, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_next5000_20260925_part01.txt
      • -
    • 351086 — running — ral — 2026-09-25 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest next-5000 vis_lp batch 2/5 (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_n5k_p02), 1000 lenses, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_next5000_20260925_part02.txt
      • -
    • 351087 — running — ral — 2026-09-25 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest next-5000 vis_lp batch 3/5 (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_n5k_p03), 1000 lenses, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_next5000_20260925_part03.txt
      • -
    • 351088 — running — ral — 2026-09-25 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest next-5000 vis_lp batch 4/5 (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_n5k_p04), 1000 lenses, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_next5000_20260925_part04.txt
      • -
    • 351089 — running — ral — 2026-09-25 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest next-5000 vis_lp batch 5/5 (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_n5k_p05), 1000 lenses, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_next5000_20260925_part05.txt
      • -
    • 351090 — open — ral — 2026-09-25 — DR1 priority-250 vis_pix array (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_prio250), 0-249, dependency afterany:350804
      • -
    • 351091 — open — ral — 2026-09-25 — DR1 priority-250 SED array (euclid_dr1_sed_prio250), 0-249 max 60 concurrent, output_sed, dependency afterany:351090
      • -
    • 356227 — running — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 priority-250 vis_pix by-eye test: tasks 0-9 of submit_initial_lens_model_vis_pix_priority250 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_prio250_test10), no dependency; full array…
      • -
    • 356319 — running — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 priority-250 SED rerun, tasks 0-9: the ten tiles with no EXT/DECam imaging, VIS + NIR Y/J/H only (euclid_dr1_sed_prio250_nironly); SED scripts no longer re…
      • -
    • 356390 — open — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 01/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=01): 992 lenses whose 351085 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pi…
      • -
    • 356447 — open — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 02/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=02): 996 lenses whose 351086 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pi…
      • -
    • 356448 — open — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 03/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=03): 997 lenses whose 351087 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pi…
      • -
    • 356449 — open — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 04/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=04): 996 lenses whose 351088 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pi…
      • -
    • 356450 — open — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 05/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=05): 994 lenses whose 351089 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pi…
      • -
    • 356451 — open — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 next-5000 SED part 01/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=01): same 992-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part01.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_s…
      • -
    • 356452 — open — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 next-5000 SED part 02/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=02): same 996-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part02.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_s…
      • -
    • 356453 — open — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 next-5000 SED part 03/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=03): same 997-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part03.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_s…
      • -
    • 356555 — open — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 next-5000 SED part 04/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=04): same 996-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part04.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_s…
      • -
    • 356556 — open — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 next-5000 SED part 05/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=05): same 994-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part05.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_s…
      • -
    • 374848 — open — ral — 2026-09-30 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 01/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 998 tiles whose vis_lp 366938 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_…
      • -
    • 374849 — open — ral — 2026-09-30 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 02/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 998 tiles whose vis_lp 367039 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_…
      • -
    • 374850 — open — ral — 2026-09-30 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 03/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 995 tiles whose vis_lp 367141 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_…
      • -
    • 374851 — open — ral — 2026-09-30 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 04/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 995 tiles whose vis_lp 367243 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_…
      • -
    • 374852 — open — ral — 2026-09-30 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 05/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 996 tiles whose vis_lp 367244 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_…
      • -
    • 377038 — open — ral — 2026-09-30 — DR1 rest-batch vis_pix part 02/4 dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_rest_p02): 945 single-task jobs ids 377038-377987, afterok:375701_N each (indices 0-944)…
      • -
    • 377988 — open — ral — 2026-09-30 — DR1 rest-batch vis_pix part 03/4 dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_rest_p03): 945 single-task jobs ids 377988-378936, afterok:375702_N each (indices 0-944)…
      • -
    • 378940 — open — ral — 2026-09-30 — DR1 rest-batch vis_pix part 04/4 dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_rest_p04): 944 single-task jobs ids 378940-379889, afterok:375703_N each (indices 0-943)…
      • -
    • 384040 — running — ral — 2026-10-01 — DR1 dr1_v2_new sep28 eclipse new_ab vis_lp (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_sep28_p01), 987 tiles (942 dr1_v2_new_cutouts_needed + 45 re-centred cut-outs; 48+21 dr1_sep1 dup…
      • -
    • 384046 — running — ral — 2026-10-01 — DR1 dr1_v2_new sep28 vis_pix dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_sep28_p01): 987 single-task jobs ids 384046-385042, each --array=N --dependency=afterok:3840…
      • -
    • 388367 — open — ral — 2026-10-03 — DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r01): 944 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_…
      • -
    • 388368 — open — ral — 2026-10-03 — DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r02): 938 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_…
      • -
    • 388369 — open — ral — 2026-10-03 — DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r03): 943 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_…
      • -
    • 388370 — open — ral — 2026-10-03 — DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r04): 939 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_…
      • -
    • 388371 — open — ral — 2026-10-03 — DR1 missing-SED sweep dr1_v2_new (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_v2new): 303 sep28 tiles with completed vis_lp 384040 — first SED on non-DECam ground bands (HSC/MegaCam/P…
      • -
    • 388372 — open — ral — 2026-10-03 — DR1 missing-SED retry probe (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_retry): tasks 0-49 of 1,252 earlier SED TIMEOUT/FAILED/partial tiles, manifest sed_missing_20261003_retry.txt,…
      • -
    • 398270 — open — ral — 2026-10-08 — DR1 dr1_sep1 ex-top1000 vis_pix chained on vis_lp 397467 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_ex_top1000_p01): immediate array 398270 over 256 lenses whose vis_lp had completed…
      • -
    • 400282 — open — ral — 2026-10-09 — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p01): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move…
      • -
    • 400308 — open — ral — 2026-10-09 — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p02): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move…
      • -
    • 400309 — open — ral — 2026-10-09 — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p03): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move…
      • -
    • 400310 — open — ral — 2026-10-09 — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p04): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move…
      • -
    • 402719 — running — ral — 2026-10-10 — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p01): indices 697-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part01.txt, replacing 400282's cancelled pending task…
      • -
    • 402720 — running — ral — 2026-10-10 — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p02): indices 527-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part02.txt, replacing 400308's cancelled pending task…
      • -
    • 402721 — running — ral — 2026-10-10 — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p03): indices 363-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part03.txt, replacing 400309's cancelled pending task…
      • -
    • 402722 — running — ral — 2026-10-10 — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p04): indices 803-862 of sed_fill_20261009/part04.txt, replacing 400310's cancelled pending task…
      • -
    • 402909 — open — ral — 2026-10-10 — DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p01): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part01.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed…
      • -
    • 402910 — open — ral — 2026-10-10 — DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p02): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part02.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed…
      • -
    • 402911 — open — ral — 2026-10-10 — DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p03): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part03.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed…
      • -
    • 402912 — open — ral — 2026-10-10 — DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p04): indices 0-862 of sed_fill_20261009/part04.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed…
      • -
    -

    Last 5

    -
      -
    • 2026-10-10 — run — 402912 submitted: DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p04): indices 0-862 of sed_fill_20261009/part04.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/…
      • -
    • 2026-10-10 — run — 402911 submitted: DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p03): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part03.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/…
      • -
    • 2026-10-10 — run — 402910 submitted: DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p02): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part02.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/…
      • -
    • 2026-10-10 — run — 402909 submitted: DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p01): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part01.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/…
      • -
    • 2026-10-10 — run — 400314 failed: DR1 SED fill 3 pass 2 (retry) part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_retry_p04): same script and manifest part04.txt, afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 and the old fill 397469/70/71/74; complete tiles exit at once, so…
      • +

      active · both · no issue yet

      +
    +
+
+
+

euclid_dr1

Does the sep1 DR1 delivery reproduce the ten prelim lenses by eye16 running · 42 open · updated 2026-10-10 +
+
+
Registered:
2026-09-11
+
Local:
/mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/euclid_dr1
+
RAL:
/mnt/ral/jnightin/euclid_dr1
+
+

Current position

+

The top-1000 DR1 sep1 vis_lp array finished 971 of 1000; 29 hit the 18-hour walltime. Array 344645 is now running vis_pix with the Numba CPU sparse route for those 971 completed lenses only.

+ +
+

Runs (58)

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
JobStatePartitionDateDescription
342650openral2026-09-11
euclid_dr1 sep1 reproduction: the ten euclid_dr1_prelim lenses refitted from the sep1 delivery through prelim's route (hpc/batch_cpu/submit_initial_lens_model_…show less

euclid_dr1 sep1 reproduction: the ten euclid_dr1_prelim lenses refitted from the sep1 delivery through prelim's route (hpc/batch_cpu/submit_initial_lens_model_two_stage: vis_lp then vis_pix), array 0-9, wall budget 36:00;
the by-eye reference is prelim run 342629

345279runningral2026-09-20VIS-LP JAX CPU pilot for the nine remainder tiles completing the first ten sorted DR1 lenses;
single RGB thumbnails uploaded
345305runningral2026-09-20DR1 full vis_lp production batch 1/5: rest_01, 1000 lenses, output root dr1_full
345669openral2026-09-20DR1 full vis_lp production batch 2/5: rest_02, 1000 lenses, output root dr1_full
345670openral2026-09-20DR1 full vis_lp production batch 3/5: rest_03, 1000 lenses, output root dr1_full
345671openral2026-09-20DR1 full vis_lp production batch 4/5: rest_04, 1000 lenses, output root dr1_full
345672openral2026-09-20DR1 full vis_lp production batch 5/5: rest_05, 1000 lenses, output root dr1_full
349353openral2026-09-21100-tile dr1_sep1_rest SED array: Sersic VIS with lens-light n~Uniform(0.5,10.0), then NIR Y/J/H and EXT DECam g/r/i/z;
output_sed;
max 20 concurrent
350581openral2026-09-23vis_lp-only inspection bundle over 4,912 completed dr1_sep1_rest tiles (vislp_full_20260923, OUTPUT_DIR=dr1_full, single 24 h CPU job)
350804runningral2026-09-25
DR1 dr1_sep1_rest priority-250 vis_lp array (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_prio250), 0-249, manifest hpc/run_manifests/positions_priority_250.txt, positions finder 2.1 pos…show less

DR1 dr1_sep1_rest priority-250 vis_lp array (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_prio250), 0-249, manifest hpc/run_manifests/positions_priority_250.txt, positions finder 2.1 positions

351085runningral2026-09-25DR1 dr1_sep1_rest next-5000 vis_lp batch 1/5 (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_n5k_p01), 1000 lenses, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_next5000_20260925_part01.txt
351086runningral2026-09-25DR1 dr1_sep1_rest next-5000 vis_lp batch 2/5 (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_n5k_p02), 1000 lenses, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_next5000_20260925_part02.txt
351087runningral2026-09-25DR1 dr1_sep1_rest next-5000 vis_lp batch 3/5 (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_n5k_p03), 1000 lenses, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_next5000_20260925_part03.txt
351088runningral2026-09-25DR1 dr1_sep1_rest next-5000 vis_lp batch 4/5 (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_n5k_p04), 1000 lenses, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_next5000_20260925_part04.txt
351089runningral2026-09-25DR1 dr1_sep1_rest next-5000 vis_lp batch 5/5 (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_n5k_p05), 1000 lenses, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_next5000_20260925_part05.txt
351090openral2026-09-25DR1 priority-250 vis_pix array (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_prio250), 0-249, dependency afterany:350804
351091openral2026-09-25DR1 priority-250 SED array (euclid_dr1_sed_prio250), 0-249 max 60 concurrent, output_sed, dependency afterany:351090
356227runningral2026-09-26
DR1 priority-250 vis_pix by-eye test: tasks 0-9 of submit_initial_lens_model_vis_pix_priority250 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_prio250_test10), no dependency;
full array…show less

DR1 priority-250 vis_pix by-eye test: tasks 0-9 of submit_initial_lens_model_vis_pix_priority250 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_prio250_test10), no dependency;
full array 351090 put on scontrol hold until the human has looked

356319runningral2026-09-26
DR1 priority-250 SED rerun, tasks 0-9: the ten tiles with no EXT/DECam imaging, VIS + NIR Y/J/H only (euclid_dr1_sed_prio250_nironly);
SED scripts no longer re…show less

DR1 priority-250 SED rerun, tasks 0-9: the ten tiles with no EXT/DECam imaging, VIS + NIR Y/J/H only (euclid_dr1_sed_prio250_nironly);
SED scripts no longer refuse no-EXT tiles

356390openral2026-09-26
DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 01/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=01): 992 lenses whose 351085 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pi…show less

DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 01/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=01): 992 lenses whose 351085 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part01.txt, array 0-991%100, 8 CPU/64 GB/18 h, no dependency

356447openral2026-09-26
DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 02/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=02): 996 lenses whose 351086 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pi…show less

DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 02/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=02): 996 lenses whose 351086 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part02.txt, array 0-995%100, 8 CPU/64 GB/18 h, no dependency

356448openral2026-09-26
DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 03/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=03): 997 lenses whose 351087 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pi…show less

DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 03/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=03): 997 lenses whose 351087 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part03.txt, array 0-996%100, 8 CPU/64 GB/18 h, no dependency

356449openral2026-09-26
DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 04/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=04): 996 lenses whose 351088 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pi…show less

DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 04/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=04): 996 lenses whose 351088 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part04.txt, array 0-995%100, 8 CPU/64 GB/18 h, no dependency

356450openral2026-09-26
DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 05/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=05): 994 lenses whose 351089 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pi…show less

DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 05/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=05): 994 lenses whose 351089 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part05.txt, array 0-993%100, 8 CPU/64 GB/18 h, no dependency

356451openral2026-09-26
DR1 next-5000 SED part 01/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=01): same 992-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part01.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_s…show less

DR1 next-5000 SED part 01/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=01): same 992-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part01.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_sed, array 0-991%60, 6 h, independent of vis_pix;
no-EXT tiles fit VIS + NIR only

356452openral2026-09-26
DR1 next-5000 SED part 02/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=02): same 996-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part02.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_s…show less

DR1 next-5000 SED part 02/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=02): same 996-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part02.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_sed, array 0-995%60, 6 h, independent of vis_pix;
no-EXT tiles fit VIS + NIR only

356453openral2026-09-26
DR1 next-5000 SED part 03/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=03): same 997-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part03.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_s…show less

DR1 next-5000 SED part 03/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=03): same 997-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part03.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_sed, array 0-996%60, 6 h, independent of vis_pix;
no-EXT tiles fit VIS + NIR only

356555openral2026-09-26
DR1 next-5000 SED part 04/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=04): same 996-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part04.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_s…show less

DR1 next-5000 SED part 04/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=04): same 996-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part04.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_sed, array 0-995%60, 6 h, independent of vis_pix;
no-EXT tiles fit VIS + NIR only

356556openral2026-09-26
DR1 next-5000 SED part 05/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=05): same 994-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part05.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_s…show less

DR1 next-5000 SED part 05/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=05): same 994-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part05.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_sed, array 0-993%60, 6 h, independent of vis_pix;
no-EXT tiles fit VIS + NIR only

374848openral2026-09-30
DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 01/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 998 tiles whose vis_lp 366938 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_…show less

DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 01/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 998 tiles whose vis_lp 366938 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_part01.txt, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, %40, partitions ral+gpu;
~18% TIMEOUT expected (Nautilus band hang)

374849openral2026-09-30
DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 02/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 998 tiles whose vis_lp 367039 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_…show less

DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 02/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 998 tiles whose vis_lp 367039 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_part02.txt, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, %40, partitions ral+gpu;
~18% TIMEOUT expected (Nautilus band hang)

374850openral2026-09-30
DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 03/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 995 tiles whose vis_lp 367141 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_…show less

DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 03/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 995 tiles whose vis_lp 367141 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_part03.txt, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, %40, partitions ral+gpu;
~18% TIMEOUT expected (Nautilus band hang)

374851openral2026-09-30
DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 04/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 995 tiles whose vis_lp 367243 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_…show less

DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 04/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 995 tiles whose vis_lp 367243 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_part04.txt, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, %40, partitions ral+gpu;
~18% TIMEOUT expected (Nautilus band hang)

374852openral2026-09-30
DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 05/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 996 tiles whose vis_lp 367244 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_…show less

DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 05/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 996 tiles whose vis_lp 367244 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_part05.txt, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, %40, partitions ral+gpu;
~18% TIMEOUT expected (Nautilus band hang)

377038openral2026-09-30
DR1 rest-batch vis_pix part 02/4 dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_rest_p02): 945 single-task jobs ids 377038-377987, afterok:375701_N each (indices 0-944)…show less

DR1 rest-batch vis_pix part 02/4 dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_rest_p02): 945 single-task jobs ids 377038-377987, afterok:375701_N each (indices 0-944);
8 CPU/16 GB/24 h, partitions ral+gpu;
driver submit_vis_pix_rest_chain.sh

377988openral2026-09-30
DR1 rest-batch vis_pix part 03/4 dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_rest_p03): 945 single-task jobs ids 377988-378936, afterok:375702_N each (indices 0-944)…show less

DR1 rest-batch vis_pix part 03/4 dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_rest_p03): 945 single-task jobs ids 377988-378936, afterok:375702_N each (indices 0-944);
8 CPU/16 GB/24 h, partitions ral+gpu;
driver submit_vis_pix_rest_chain.sh

378940openral2026-09-30
DR1 rest-batch vis_pix part 04/4 dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_rest_p04): 944 single-task jobs ids 378940-379889, afterok:375703_N each (indices 0-943)…show less

DR1 rest-batch vis_pix part 04/4 dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_rest_p04): 944 single-task jobs ids 378940-379889, afterok:375703_N each (indices 0-943);
8 CPU/16 GB/24 h, partitions ral+gpu;
driver submit_vis_pix_rest_chain.sh

384040runningral2026-10-01
DR1 dr1_v2_new sep28 eclipse new_ab vis_lp (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_sep28_p01), 987 tiles (942 dr1_v2_new_cutouts_needed + 45 re-centred cut-outs;
48+21 dr1_sep1 dup…show less

DR1 dr1_v2_new sep28 eclipse new_ab vis_lp (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_sep28_p01), 987 tiles (942 dr1_v2_new_cutouts_needed + 45 re-centred cut-outs;
48+21 dr1_sep1 duplicates excluded), v2 A 114 / B 873, v2_score 3.000->1.500, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_sep28_20261001.txt, 4 CPU/12 GB/18 h, finder-2.1 positions (n_lt_2 279), --array=0-986%100, partition ral only;
output/dr1_v2_new

384046runningral2026-10-01
DR1 dr1_v2_new sep28 vis_pix dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_sep28_p01): 987 single-task jobs ids 384046-385042, each --array=N --dependency=afterok:3840…show less

DR1 dr1_v2_new sep28 vis_pix dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_sep28_p01): 987 single-task jobs ids 384046-385042, each --array=N --dependency=afterok:384040_N --kill-on-invalid-dep=yes (indices 0-986);
Numba sparse CPU, 8 CPU/16 GB/24 h, partition ral only;
driver hpc/batch_cpu/submit_vis_pix_rest_chain.sh --batch=sep28 (idempotent, re-run to catch stragglers)

388367openral2026-10-03
DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r01): 944 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_…show less

DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r01): 944 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_missing_20261003_rest_part01.txt, %40, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, partition ral only, script hpc/batch_cpu/submit_sersic_waveband_missing (skips complete tiles)

388368openral2026-10-03
DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r02): 938 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_…show less

DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r02): 938 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_missing_20261003_rest_part02.txt, %40, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, partition ral only, script hpc/batch_cpu/submit_sersic_waveband_missing (skips complete tiles)

388369openral2026-10-03
DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r03): 943 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_…show less

DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r03): 943 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_missing_20261003_rest_part03.txt, %40, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, partition ral only, script hpc/batch_cpu/submit_sersic_waveband_missing (skips complete tiles)

388370openral2026-10-03
DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r04): 939 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_…show less

DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r04): 939 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_missing_20261003_rest_part04.txt, %40, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, partition ral only, script hpc/batch_cpu/submit_sersic_waveband_missing (skips complete tiles)

388371openral2026-10-03
DR1 missing-SED sweep dr1_v2_new (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_v2new): 303 sep28 tiles with completed vis_lp 384040 — first SED on non-DECam ground bands (HSC/MegaCam/P…show less

DR1 missing-SED sweep dr1_v2_new (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_v2new): 303 sep28 tiles with completed vis_lp 384040 — first SED on non-DECam ground bands (HSC/MegaCam/PS1), manifest sed_missing_20261003_v2new.txt, %10, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, partition ral only, script hpc/batch_cpu/submit_sersic_waveband_missing (skips complete tiles)

388372openral2026-10-03
DR1 missing-SED retry probe (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_retry): tasks 0-49 of 1,252 earlier SED TIMEOUT/FAILED/partial tiles, manifest sed_missing_20261003_retry.txt,…show less

DR1 missing-SED retry probe (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_retry): tasks 0-49 of 1,252 earlier SED TIMEOUT/FAILED/partial tiles, manifest sed_missing_20261003_retry.txt, %10;
send 50-1251 only if the probe does not mostly hang, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, partition ral only, script hpc/batch_cpu/submit_sersic_waveband_missing (skips complete tiles)

398270openral2026-10-08
DR1 dr1_sep1 ex-top1000 vis_pix chained on vis_lp 397467 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_ex_top1000_p01): immediate array 398270 over 256 lenses whose vis_lp had completed…show less

DR1 dr1_sep1 ex-top1000 vis_pix chained on vis_lp 397467 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_ex_top1000_p01): immediate array 398270 over 256 lenses whose vis_lp had completed (%60) + 741 single-task jobs 398271-399020 each afterok:397467_N --kill-on-invalid-dep=yes;
manifest vis_lp_ex_top1000_tonight_20261007.txt, Numba sparse CPU 8 CPU/16 GB/24 h, partition ral only, --exclude=euclid-ral-compute-[1-4] (left for another user's 252-CPU whole-node jobs) and --nice=500 so it never outranks pending work;
driver submit_vis_pix_rest_chain.sh --batch=ex_top1000 (idempotent, re-run to catch stragglers)

400282openral2026-10-09
DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p01): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move…show less

DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p01): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move hung band aside, restart;
band given up after 2 hangs via SED_SKIP_BANDS), manifest sed_fill_20261009/part01.txt (3,863 tiles over 4 parts: incomplete partial tiles fewest-missing-first, then none, then ex-top1000 with vis_lp;
tiles still running in 397469/70/71/74 excluded), %25, 8 CPU/16 GB/6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100

400308openral2026-10-09
DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p02): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move…show less

DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p02): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move hung band aside, restart;
band given up after 2 hangs via SED_SKIP_BANDS), manifest sed_fill_20261009/part02.txt (3,863 tiles over 4 parts: incomplete partial tiles fewest-missing-first, then none, then ex-top1000 with vis_lp;
tiles still running in 397469/70/71/74 excluded), %25, 8 CPU/16 GB/6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100

400309openral2026-10-09
DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p03): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move…show less

DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p03): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move hung band aside, restart;
band given up after 2 hangs via SED_SKIP_BANDS), manifest sed_fill_20261009/part03.txt (3,863 tiles over 4 parts: incomplete partial tiles fewest-missing-first, then none, then ex-top1000 with vis_lp;
tiles still running in 397469/70/71/74 excluded), %25, 8 CPU/16 GB/6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100

400310openral2026-10-09
DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p04): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move…show less

DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p04): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move hung band aside, restart;
band given up after 2 hangs via SED_SKIP_BANDS), manifest sed_fill_20261009/part04.txt (3,863 tiles over 4 parts: incomplete partial tiles fewest-missing-first, then none, then ex-top1000 with vis_lp;
tiles still running in 397469/70/71/74 excluded), %25, 8 CPU/16 GB/6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100

402719runningral2026-10-10
DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p01): indices 697-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part01.txt, replacing 400282's cancelled pending task…show less

DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p01): indices 697-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part01.txt, replacing 400282's cancelled pending tasks;
submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 = 10-09 fill + VIS given up after two hangs (exit 3, logged to sed_fill_20261009/given_up_bands.txt) and tiles already given up for vis skipped;
%25, 8 CPU/16 GB/6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100

402720runningral2026-10-10
DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p02): indices 527-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part02.txt, replacing 400308's cancelled pending task…show less

DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p02): indices 527-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part02.txt, replacing 400308's cancelled pending tasks;
submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 = 10-09 fill + VIS given up after two hangs (exit 3, logged to sed_fill_20261009/given_up_bands.txt) and tiles already given up for vis skipped;
%25, 8 CPU/16 GB/6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100

402721runningral2026-10-10
DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p03): indices 363-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part03.txt, replacing 400309's cancelled pending task…show less

DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p03): indices 363-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part03.txt, replacing 400309's cancelled pending tasks;
submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 = 10-09 fill + VIS given up after two hangs (exit 3, logged to sed_fill_20261009/given_up_bands.txt) and tiles already given up for vis skipped;
%25, 8 CPU/16 GB/6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100

402722runningral2026-10-10
DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p04): indices 803-862 of sed_fill_20261009/part04.txt, replacing 400310's cancelled pending task…show less

DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p04): indices 803-862 of sed_fill_20261009/part04.txt, replacing 400310's cancelled pending tasks;
submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 = 10-09 fill + VIS given up after two hangs (exit 3, logged to sed_fill_20261009/given_up_bands.txt) and tiles already given up for vis skipped;
%25, 8 CPU/16 GB/6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100

402909openral2026-10-10
DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p01): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part01.txt;
same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed…show less

DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p01): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part01.txt;
same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest;
afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 (old, running tasks) and 402719-402722;
complete tiles exit at once and tiles with vis given up are skipped, so it reruns only what is still incomplete;
%25, 6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100

402910openral2026-10-10
DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p02): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part02.txt;
same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed…show less

DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p02): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part02.txt;
same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest;
afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 (old, running tasks) and 402719-402722;
complete tiles exit at once and tiles with vis given up are skipped, so it reruns only what is still incomplete;
%25, 6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100

402911openral2026-10-10
DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p03): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part03.txt;
same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed…show less

DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p03): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part03.txt;
same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest;
afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 (old, running tasks) and 402719-402722;
complete tiles exit at once and tiles with vis given up are skipped, so it reruns only what is still incomplete;
%25, 6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100

402912openral2026-10-10
DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p04): indices 0-862 of sed_fill_20261009/part04.txt;
same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed…show less

DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p04): indices 0-862 of sed_fill_20261009/part04.txt;
same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest;
afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 (old, running tasks) and 402719-402722;
complete tiles exit at once and tiles with vis given up are skipped, so it reruns only what is still incomplete;
%25, 6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100

+
Recent log — 5 of 136 entries +
    +
  • 2026-10-10 — run —
    402912 submitted: DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p04): indices 0-862 of sed_fill_20261009/part04.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/…show less

    402912 submitted: DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p04): indices 0-862 of sed_fill_20261009/part04.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 (old, running tasks) and 402719-402722; complete tiles exit at once and tiles with vis given up are skipped, so it reruns only what is still incomplete; %25, 6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100

    • +
  • 2026-10-10 — run —
    402911 submitted: DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p03): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part03.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/…show less

    402911 submitted: DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p03): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part03.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 (old, running tasks) and 402719-402722; complete tiles exit at once and tiles with vis given up are skipped, so it reruns only what is still incomplete; %25, 6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100

    • +
  • 2026-10-10 — run —
    402910 submitted: DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p02): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part02.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/…show less

    402910 submitted: DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p02): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part02.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 (old, running tasks) and 402719-402722; complete tiles exit at once and tiles with vis given up are skipped, so it reruns only what is still incomplete; %25, 6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100

    • +
  • 2026-10-10 — run —
    402909 submitted: DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p01): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part01.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/…show less

    402909 submitted: DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p01): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part01.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 (old, running tasks) and 402719-402722; complete tiles exit at once and tiles with vis given up are skipped, so it reruns only what is still incomplete; %25, 6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100

    • +
  • 2026-10-10 — run —
    400314 failed: DR1 SED fill 3 pass 2 (retry) part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_retry_p04): same script and manifest part04.txt, afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 and the old fill 397469/70/71/74; complete tiles exit at once, so…show less

    400314 failed: DR1 SED fill 3 pass 2 (retry) part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_retry_p04): same script and manifest part04.txt, afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 and the old fill 397469/70/71/74; complete tiles exit at once, so it reruns only what is still incomplete; %25, 6 h, partition ral only

full log

-

resume euclid_dr1

- -
-

analytic_gaussian — Graphical and EP against a closed-form Gaussian posterior, at ensemble scale

-

active · ral · PyAutoCortex#34 · projects/analytic_gaussian.md · local /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/analytic_gaussian · RAL /mnt/ral/jnightin/active/analytic_gaussian

-

Now

-

Wave 1 (342413, 200 seeds at N=5) is accepted as the baseline: autofit EP is exact on the Gaussian leg, leg B sigma misses as pre-registered (78/200), collapse rate 0/200. On criterion 2, astra and an independent Opus review both favour an under-calibrated mu threshold (calibrated on five unrepresentative seeds) and found no defect in the minimal-EP control; both flag the per-site sigma>0 clip (analytic_ep_minimal.py:333) as the one audit target, and astra will not clear the control without an independent reconstruction of the EP fixed point. Next: run the planned diagnostic (archive/tasks/analytic_gaussian/minimal_ep_legb_mu_threshold.md) on a passing, an edge and the worst mu seed; the N=25 rung stays written but unsubmitted until it lands.

-

Runs

+

active · ral · no issue yet

+
+
+
+
+

analytic_gaussian

Graphical and EP against a closed-form Gaussian posterior, at ensemble scaleno runs recorded · updated 2026-10-14 +
+
+
Registered:
not recorded
+
Local:
/mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/analytic_gaussian
+
RAL:
/mnt/ral/jnightin/active/analytic_gaussian
+
+

Current position

+

Wave 1 (342413, 200 seeds at N=5) is accepted as the baseline: autofit EP is exact on the Gaussian leg, leg B sigma misses as pre-registered (78/200), collapse rate 0/200. On criterion 2, astra and an independent Opus review both favour an under-calibrated mu threshold (calibrated on five unrepresentative seeds) and found no defect in the minimal-EP control; both flag the per-site sigma>0 clip (analytic_ep_minimal.py:333) as the one audit target, and astra will not clear the control without an independent reconstruction of the EP fixed point. Next: run the planned diagnostic (archive/tasks/analytic_gaussian/minimal_ep_legb_mu_threshold.md) on a passing, an edge and the worst mu seed; the N=25 rung stays written but unsubmitted until it lands.

+ +
+

Runs (0)

nothing on the cluster

-

Last 5

-
    -
  • 2026-10-14 — note — PyAutoFit#1656 (merged 2026-09-30, released 2026.10.7.1) ports the minimal-EP referee's moment matching as LaplaceOptimiser(projection="moments"); on analytic_gaussian.py leg B autofit EP sigma 6.3401 ± 2.4609 vs closed form 6.5667 ± 2.883…
    • +
    Recent log — 5 of 7 entries +
      +
    • 2026-10-14 — note —
      PyAutoFit#1656 (merged 2026-09-30, released 2026.10.7.1) ports the minimal-EP referee's moment matching as LaplaceOptimiser(projection="moments"); on analytic_gaussian.py leg B autofit EP sigma 6.3401 ± 2.4609 vs closed form 6.5667 ± 2.883…show less

      PyAutoFit#1656 (merged 2026-09-30, released 2026.10.7.1) ports the minimal-EP referee's moment matching as LaplaceOptimiser(projection="moments"); on analytic_gaussian.py leg B autofit EP sigma 6.3401 ± 2.4609 vs closed form 6.5667 ± 2.8832 (mode path 9.3722, BAD_PROJECTION=19). A wave-2 ensemble on the moments path needs a private PyAutoFit checkout on RAL: the shared mirror is 404b3e5f7 and lacks it. The criterion-2 mu-threshold diagnostic is still unrun.

    • 2026-10-14 — note — output/ vaulted to z_vault/ on laptop and RAL (mv, nothing deleted), anticipating reruns; output/ left empty, results/ untouched; z_vault/ gitignored locally
      • -
    • 2026-09-30 — note — astra (Codex gpt-6-astra) on criterion 2, verbatim: 'Neither is established as "wrong" by this result alone. I favour inadequate calibration of the threshold, with moderate confidence, but would not yet certify the control.' Decisive diagn…
      • +
    • 2026-09-30 — note —
      astra (Codex gpt-6-astra) on criterion 2, verbatim: 'Neither is established as "wrong" by this result alone. I favour inadequate calibration of the threshold, with moderate confidence, but would not yet certify the control.' Decisive diagn…show less

      astra (Codex gpt-6-astra) on criterion 2, verbatim: 'Neither is established as "wrong" by this result alone. I favour inadequate calibration of the threshold, with moderate confidence, but would not yet certify the control.' Decisive diagnostic: independently reconstruct the same EP factorisation at the fixed point on a passing, an edge and the worst mu seed and compare tilted vs q moments; audit the per-site sigma>0 clip (analytic_ep_minimal.py:333). Opus reviewer concurs independently (a_mu = 0.041*(E_ref[mu]-m0)/std_ref over 200 seeds, corr 0.98; calibration seeds 0-4 had |a_mu| 0.002-0.020 vs 95th pct 0.077). Full answer: PyAutoCortex#50 comment https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/issues/50#issuecomment-5908448194

    • 2026-09-10 — result — accepted ensemble_parity (R-20260910-04): ok accept and intake the things to address. we can do another run down the line so also achieve the results in the analytic_gaussian project for future comparison
    • 2026-09-10 — note — question: Is criterion 2's mu threshold or the minimal-EP control wrong — planned, never run [archive/tasks/analytic_gaussian/minimal_ep_legb_mu_threshold.md]

    full log

    -

    resume analytic_gaussian

    - -
    -

    ep_toy_gaussian — NUTS versus three EP fits on the #1405 collapse toy at N=50

    -

    active · ral · ep_toy_gaussian#1 · projects/ep_toy_gaussian.md · local /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/ep_toy_gaussian · RAL /mnt/ral/jnightin/active/ep_toy_gaussian

    -

    Now

    -

    Wave 1 (n50_seed42: 342639 + 342640_[0-2]) failed on infrastructure — EP x3 on EMFILE (fixed by PyAutoFit#1632/#1634, both in the RAL mirror at 404b3e5f7), NUTS on OOM at the 8 GB cap while XLA compiled the 50-factor window-adaptation scan, which grows with N (≥5.4 GB at N=20 locally). Wave 2 is prepared but not submitted: sample n50_seed42_w2 (free locally and on RAL; still needs its toy.SAMPLES entry), submit_nuts raised to 64 GB, submit_ep unchanged at 8 GB (peak ~590 MB). The collapse question at N=50 is unanswered; only n5_smoke speaks (EP RECOVER 3/3, NUTS 49.89/11.14). Next: human go, add the sample entry, push and submit NUTS then EP with SAMPLE=n50_seed42_w2 exported.

    -

    Runs

    +

    active · ral · PyAutoCortex#34

    +
    +
+
+
+

ep_toy_gaussian

NUTS versus three EP fits on the #1405 collapse toy at N=50no runs recorded · updated 2026-10-14 +
+
+
Registered:
not recorded
+
Local:
/mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/ep_toy_gaussian
+
RAL:
/mnt/ral/jnightin/active/ep_toy_gaussian
+
+

Current position

+

Wave 1 (n50_seed42: 342639 + 342640_[0-2]) failed on infrastructure — EP x3 on EMFILE (fixed by PyAutoFit#1632/#1634, both in the RAL mirror at 404b3e5f7), NUTS on OOM at the 8 GB cap while XLA compiled the 50-factor window-adaptation scan, which grows with N (≥5.4 GB at N=20 locally). Wave 2 is prepared but not submitted: sample n50_seed42_w2 (free locally and on RAL; still needs its toy.SAMPLES entry), submit_nuts raised to 64 GB, submit_ep unchanged at 8 GB (peak ~590 MB). The collapse question at N=50 is unanswered; only n5_smoke speaks (EP RECOVER 3/3, NUTS 49.89/11.14). Next: human go, add the sample entry, push and submit NUTS then EP with SAMPLE=n50_seed42_w2 exported.

+ +
+

Runs (0)

nothing on the cluster

-

Last 5

-
    +
    Recent log — 5 of 10 entries +
    • 2026-10-14 — note — Wave 2 still unsubmitted. RAL shared mirror 404b3e5f7 already carries the EMFILE fixes (#1632/#1634) wave 2 needs; it lacks #1655 (ProjectionException recovery), so a private PyAutoFit checkout is optional here but advisable.
    • 2026-10-14 — note — output/ vaulted to z_vault/ on laptop and RAL (mv, nothing deleted), anticipating reruns; output/ left empty, results/ untouched; z_vault/ gitignored locally
      • -
    • 2026-09-30 — note — RAL mirror PyAutoFit now 404b3e5f7 (2026-09-27), contains #1632 (b82fb3f69) and #1634 (fa2d540ac); 5 commits behind origin/main, none in blackjax/graphical/dynesty; deps at floor except anesthetic 2.8.14 < 2.9.0 (plots only). Sample n50_se…
      • -
    • 2026-09-30 — note — wave-2 prep: 342639 NUTS OOM was XLA compilation of the vmapped window-adaptation scan, not sampling (sacct MaxRSS 8,180,536K at ReqMem 8G; py-spy on a local N=50 run sits in backend_compile_and_load; local probes N=10 3.2 GB peak / 132 s…
      • -
    • 2026-09-24 — note — per-search overhead profile on this toy (2026-09-24, laptop, N=5, max_steps=3): 2.45 s per Dynesty factor search, ~1.47 s dynesty run_nested + ~0.98 s autofit wrapper (plots, a redundant second run_nested pass, samples writes); inside run_…
      • +
    • 2026-09-30 — note —
      RAL mirror PyAutoFit now 404b3e5f7 (2026-09-27), contains #1632 (b82fb3f69) and #1634 (fa2d540ac); 5 commits behind origin/main, none in blackjax/graphical/dynesty; deps at floor except anesthetic 2.8.14 < 2.9.0 (plots only). Sample n50_se…show less

      RAL mirror PyAutoFit now 404b3e5f7 (2026-09-27), contains #1632 (b82fb3f69) and #1634 (fa2d540ac); 5 commits behind origin/main, none in blackjax/graphical/dynesty; deps at floor except anesthetic 2.8.14 < 2.9.0 (plots only). Sample n50_seed42_w2 is free locally and on RAL but must be added to toy.SAMPLES (scripts/toy.py) before submission, and SAMPLE must be exported to the job (hpc/sync submit does not forward laptop env)

      • +
    • 2026-09-30 — note —
      wave-2 prep: 342639 NUTS OOM was XLA compilation of the vmapped window-adaptation scan, not sampling (sacct MaxRSS 8,180,536K at ReqMem 8G; py-spy on a local N=50 run sits in backend_compile_and_load; local probes N=10 3.2 GB peak / 132 s…show less

      wave-2 prep: 342639 NUTS OOM was XLA compilation of the vmapped window-adaptation scan, not sampling (sacct MaxRSS 8,180,536K at ReqMem 8G; py-spy on a local N=50 run sits in backend_compile_and_load; local probes N=10 3.2 GB peak / 132 s warmup compile, N=20 >=5.4 GB / 247 s, N=50 still compiling at 5 min) — submit_nuts --mem raised 8gb -> 64gb locally, uncommitted (est. peak 15-25 GB on RAL; ral nodes ~921 GB); EP peak ~590 MB, submit_ep stays 8gb

      • +
    • 2026-09-24 — note —
      per-search overhead profile on this toy (2026-09-24, laptop, N=5, max_steps=3): 2.45 s per Dynesty factor search, ~1.47 s dynesty run_nested + ~0.98 s autofit wrapper (plots, a redundant second run_nested pass, samples writes); inside run_…show less

      per-search overhead profile on this toy (2026-09-24, laptop, N=5, max_steps=3): 2.45 s per Dynesty factor search, ~1.47 s dynesty run_nested + ~0.98 s autofit wrapper (plots, a redundant second run_nested pass, samples writes); inside run_nested instance_from_vector is 57 % of the likelihood callback for a 1-parameter model. Speed-up prompt filed in the Mind: draft/refactor/autofit/ep_factor_search_wrapper_overhead.md

    full log

    -

    resume ep_toy_gaussian

    - -
    -

    slope_hierarchy_scale — Hierarchical slope recovery with graphical and EP at N=25 to 50

    -

    active · both · slope_hierarchy_scale#2 · projects/slope_hierarchy_scale.md · local /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/slope_hierarchy_scale · RAL /mnt/ral/jnightin/active/slope_hierarchy_scale

    -

    Now

    -

    The N=25 graphical baselines are in: per-lens fits (342348) give a naive parent of 1.999 / 0.089 (deconvolved 0.085), and the joint NUTS fit (342350_0) recovers mean 1.994 [1.976, 2.014] and sigma 0.087 [0.074, 0.104] against truth 2.0 / 0.1; its summary JSON still needs writing offline from samples.csv (now under z_vault/sample_n25_seed42). The EP arm returned the prior on the Laplace projection (343299: hierarchical factor 0/50 SUCCESS). The cure has landed: PyAutoFit#1656 (merged 2026-09-30, released 2026.10.7.1) adds af.LaplaceOptimiser(projection="moments"), which takes the tight toy from 0 to 3/3 SUCCESS. The shared RAL PyAutoFit mirror is still 404b3e5f7 (2026-09-27, kept frozen for euclid_dr1) and lacks both #1655 and #1656, so any rerun needs a private PyAutoFit checkout on RAL. All earlier output is vaulted in z_vault/ on laptop and RAL, output/ is empty for the rerun. Next: rerun the N=25 EP arm with projection="moments" on a private PyAutoFit checkout and compare its scatter against the NUTS baseline.

    -

    Runs

    +

    active · ral · ep_toy_gaussian#1

    +
    +
+
+
+

slope_hierarchy_scale

Hierarchical slope recovery with graphical and EP at N=25 to 50no runs recorded · updated 2026-10-14 +
+
+
Registered:
not recorded
+
Local:
/mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/slope_hierarchy_scale
+
RAL:
/mnt/ral/jnightin/active/slope_hierarchy_scale
+
+

Current position

+

The N=25 graphical baselines are in: per-lens fits (342348) give a naive parent of 1.999 / 0.089 (deconvolved 0.085), and the joint NUTS fit (342350_0) recovers mean 1.994 [1.976, 2.014] and sigma 0.087 [0.074, 0.104] against truth 2.0 / 0.1; its summary JSON still needs writing offline from samples.csv (now under z_vault/sample_n25_seed42). The EP arm returned the prior on the Laplace projection (343299: hierarchical factor 0/50 SUCCESS). The cure has landed: PyAutoFit#1656 (merged 2026-09-30, released 2026.10.7.1) adds af.LaplaceOptimiser(projection="moments"), which takes the tight toy from 0 to 3/3 SUCCESS. The shared RAL PyAutoFit mirror is still 404b3e5f7 (2026-09-27, kept frozen for euclid_dr1) and lacks both #1655 and #1656, so any rerun needs a private PyAutoFit checkout on RAL. All earlier output is vaulted in z_vault/ on laptop and RAL, output/ is empty for the rerun. Next: rerun the N=25 EP arm with projection="moments" on a private PyAutoFit checkout and compare its scatter against the NUTS baseline.

+ +
+

Runs (0)

nothing on the cluster

-

Last 5

-
    +
    Recent log — 5 of 14 entries +
    • 2026-10-14 — note — output/ vaulted to z_vault/ on laptop and RAL (mv, nothing deleted), anticipating reruns; output/ left empty, results/ untouched; z_vault/ gitignored locally
      • -
    • 2026-09-30 — note — graphical baselines recorded late at the 2026-09-30 check-in. 342348_[0-24] per-lens (one_by_one Nautilus, A100, 25/25, 6.9-8.8 min/task, 0 float32 truncations): naive parent mean 1.9992 +/- 0.0178 (SEM), std of medians 0.0889, deconvolved…
      • -
    • 2026-09-30 — run — 342351_0 failed — wall 27:41: n25_scale_up: EP arm on the CPU partition, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_ep, max_steps 12; RAL PyAutoFit mirror 68ff9bd57 predates PyAutoFit#1580, so this arm runs without the stale-mask fixed-point fix — CANCELLED 202…
      • -
    • 2026-09-30 — run — 342350_0 failed — wall 16:29: n25_scale_up: joint hierarchical NUTS fit, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_graphical — OUT_OF_MEMORY 2026-09-09 13:06:31 BST (sacct 0:125, cgroup oom-kill): NUTS warm-up 500 + sampling 1000 steps completed and samples.cs…
      • -
    • 2026-09-30 — run — 342348_[0-24] finished — wall 3:22: n25_scale_up: one lens per array task, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_one_by_one, sample_n25_seed42 — all 25 tasks COMPLETED 2026-09-08 17:14-20:37 BST (sacct, 6:54-8:50 per task, serial on the GPU): per-lens one_…
      • +
    • 2026-09-30 — note —
      graphical baselines recorded late at the 2026-09-30 check-in. 342348_[0-24] per-lens (one_by_one Nautilus, A100, 25/25, 6.9-8.8 min/task, 0 float32 truncations): naive parent mean 1.9992 +/- 0.0178 (SEM), std of medians 0.0889, deconvolved…show less

      graphical baselines recorded late at the 2026-09-30 check-in. 342348_[0-24] per-lens (one_by_one Nautilus, A100, 25/25, 6.9-8.8 min/task, 0 float32 truncations): naive parent mean 1.9992 +/- 0.0178 (SEM), std of medians 0.0889, deconvolved scatter 0.0852 (rms 1-sigma half-width 0.0255); truth inside the 1-sigma interval for 17/25 lenses; per-lens JSONs on RAL at results/one_by_one_sample_n25_seed42/dataset_*.json (not pulled; aggregate never written by the array). 342350_0 joint hierarchical NUTS: science completed despite the post-processing OOM — 500 warm-up (8h08m) + 1000 samples (7h17m), 1 chain, 0 divergences, acceptance 0.84, rhat_max 1.012, ess_min 133/302 params; parent mean 1.9936 [1.9761, 2.0136] 68%, sigma 0.0871 [0.0744, 0.1041] 68% (95% [0.0636, 0.1190]) vs truth 2.0/0.1 and realised draws 1.9917/0.0864 — the N=5 high-scatter bias (0.143) is gone at N=25. Computed from RAL samples.csv (graphical_nuts/f16c32e17f570603a1dc061f95792798/files); results/graphical_nuts_sample_n25_seed42.json never written (killed at 64 GB in latent/arviz post-processing) — pull samples.csv and write the summary offline

      • +
    • 2026-09-30 — run —
      342351_0 failed — wall 27:41: n25_scale_up: EP arm on the CPU partition, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_ep, max_steps 12; RAL PyAutoFit mirror 68ff9bd57 predates PyAutoFit#1580, so this arm runs without the stale-mask fixed-point fix — CANCELLED 202…show less

      342351_0 failed — wall 27:41: n25_scale_up: EP arm on the CPU partition, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_ep, max_steps 12; RAL PyAutoFit mirror 68ff9bd57 predates PyAutoFit#1580, so this arm runs without the stale-mask fixed-point fix — CANCELLED 2026-09-09 20:56:19 BST (sacct 1-03:41:06): log stops at the first Nautilus status line 2026-09-08 17:15:36, no factor finished; superseded by 342410 then 343299, output parked as ep_dead_342351; recorded late at the 2026-09-30 check-in

      • +
    • 2026-09-30 — run —
      342350_0 failed — wall 16:29: n25_scale_up: joint hierarchical NUTS fit, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_graphical — OUT_OF_MEMORY 2026-09-09 13:06:31 BST (sacct 0:125, cgroup oom-kill): NUTS warm-up 500 + sampling 1000 steps completed and samples.cs…show less

      342350_0 failed — wall 16:29: n25_scale_up: joint hierarchical NUTS fit, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_graphical — OUT_OF_MEMORY 2026-09-09 13:06:31 BST (sacct 0:125, cgroup oom-kill): NUTS warm-up 500 + sampling 1000 steps completed and samples.csv was written 12:14 (output/sample_n25_seed42/graphical/graphical_nuts/f16c32e17f570603a1dc061f95792798/files/samples.csv), then killed during latent samples / arviz post-processing; recorded late at the 2026-09-30 check-in

      • +
    • 2026-09-30 — run —
      342348_[0-24] finished — wall 3:22: n25_scale_up: one lens per array task, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_one_by_one, sample_n25_seed42 — all 25 tasks COMPLETED 2026-09-08 17:14-20:37 BST (sacct, 6:54-8:50 per task, serial on the GPU): per-lens one_…show less

      342348_[0-24] finished — wall 3:22: n25_scale_up: one lens per array task, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_one_by_one, sample_n25_seed42 — all 25 tasks COMPLETED 2026-09-08 17:14-20:37 BST (sacct, 6:54-8:50 per task, serial on the GPU): per-lens one_by_one slopes are the baseline, e.g. dataset_0 2.0417 [2.0130, 2.0730] (truth 2.0305), dataset_24 2.0333 [2.0205, 2.0463] (truth 2.0439); recorded late at the 2026-09-30 check-in

    full log

    -

    resume slope_hierarchy_scale

    - -
    -

    ic50_workspace — EP against the graphical joint fit on IC50 dose-response data, scaling up

    -

    active · ral · PyAutoCortex#36 · projects/ic50_workspace.md · local /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/ic50_workspace · RAL /mnt/ral/jnightin/active/ic50_workspace

    -

    Now

    -

    The scale ladder is in. EP passes N=5/10/25 with coef_mean within 3σ and cost growing about linearly per sweep (26/50/140 s); it died at N=50 on a projection assert. That fix has landed: PyAutoFit#1655 (merged 2026-09-30, released 2026.10.7.1) raises ProjectionException, which EP factor_step now recovers from instead of killing the run. Graphical is cheaper but overconfident beyond N=25, and EP hill_coef widths are not yet comparable because util.py reports factor-message widths. The shared RAL PyAutoFit mirror is still 404b3e5f7 (2026-09-27, kept frozen for euclid_dr1) and lacks both #1655 and #1656, so any rerun needs a private PyAutoFit checkout on RAL. All earlier output is vaulted in z_vault/ on laptop and RAL, output/ is empty for the rerun. Next: rerun the EP ladder on a private PyAutoFit checkout with output on and a fixed seed, report hill_coef from the mean field, then give ep_lbfgs_jax a witness as the scale lever.

    -

    Runs

    +

    active · both · slope_hierarchy_scale#2

    +
    +
+
+
+

ic50_workspace

EP against the graphical joint fit on IC50 dose-response data, scaling upno runs recorded · updated 2026-10-14 +
+
+
Registered:
not recorded
+
Local:
/mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/ic50_workspace
+
RAL:
/mnt/ral/jnightin/active/ic50_workspace
+
+

Current position

+

The scale ladder is in. EP passes N=5/10/25 with coef_mean within 3σ and cost growing about linearly per sweep (26/50/140 s); it died at N=50 on a projection assert. That fix has landed: PyAutoFit#1655 (merged 2026-09-30, released 2026.10.7.1) raises ProjectionException, which EP factor_step now recovers from instead of killing the run. Graphical is cheaper but overconfident beyond N=25, and EP hill_coef widths are not yet comparable because util.py reports factor-message widths. The shared RAL PyAutoFit mirror is still 404b3e5f7 (2026-09-27, kept frozen for euclid_dr1) and lacks both #1655 and #1656, so any rerun needs a private PyAutoFit checkout on RAL. All earlier output is vaulted in z_vault/ on laptop and RAL, output/ is empty for the rerun. Next: rerun the EP ladder on a private PyAutoFit checkout with output on and a fixed seed, report hill_coef from the mean field, then give ep_lbfgs_jax a witness as the scale lever.

+ +
+

Runs (0)

nothing on the cluster

-

Last 5

-
    +
    Recent log — 5 of 12 entries +
    • 2026-10-14 — note — output/ vaulted to z_vault/ on laptop and RAL (mv, nothing deleted), anticipating reruns; output/ left empty, results/ untouched; z_vault/ gitignored locally
      • -
    • 2026-09-30 — note — Ladder read: EP s/sweep 26/50/140/~300 s at N=5/10/25/50 vs graphical wall 21/42/119/281 s. EP hill_coef widths flat at ~0.8 because util.py reports factor-message (likelihood) widths and the global factor freezes hill_coef; graphical widt…
      • -
    • 2026-09-30 — note — 342411 N=50 failure diagnosed: AssertionError at autofit/messages/abstract.py:316 while projecting the global factor after EP sweep 4 (mirror 66f9f8d5d); the 4th global search had max logL -337 (vs -69 at sweep 3) and logz +/- nan. Library…
      • -
    • 2026-09-09 — run — 342411 failed — wall 0:38: ep_scale_up: EP scale ladder, sim rungs 5/10/25/50, nlive 150 max_steps 12 — finished 2026-09-09 23:19:29 BST (sacct COMPLETED 00:38:49, the ladder catches rung failures): rungs N=5/10/25 passed the global coef_m…
      • -
    • 2026-09-09 — run — 342412 finished — wall 0:07: ep_scale_up: graphical scale ladder, sim rungs 5/10/25/50, nlive 150 — COMPLETED 2026-09-09 22:48:42 BST (sacct 00:07:59): all four rungs N=5/10/25/50 passed the global coef_mean assertions (within 3σ); results…
      • +
    • 2026-09-30 — note —
      Ladder read: EP s/sweep 26/50/140/~300 s at N=5/10/25/50 vs graphical wall 21/42/119/281 s. EP hill_coef widths flat at ~0.8 because util.py reports factor-message (likelihood) widths and the global factor freezes hill_coef; graphical widt…show less

      Ladder read: EP s/sweep 26/50/140/~300 s at N=5/10/25/50 vs graphical wall 21/42/119/281 s. EP hill_coef widths flat at ~0.8 because util.py reports factor-message (likelihood) widths and the global factor freezes hill_coef; graphical widths shrink but fall to 56/75 and 65/150 within 3 sigma at N=25/50 (overconfident). coef_mean passes 3 sigma for both methods on every completed rung.

      • +
    • 2026-09-30 — note —
      342411 N=50 failure diagnosed: AssertionError at autofit/messages/abstract.py:316 while projecting the global factor after EP sweep 4 (mirror 66f9f8d5d); the 4th global search had max logL -337 (vs -69 at sweep 3) and logz +/- nan. Library…show less

      342411 N=50 failure diagnosed: AssertionError at autofit/messages/abstract.py:316 while projecting the global factor after EP sweep 4 (mirror 66f9f8d5d); the 4th global search had max logL -337 (vs -69 at sweep 3) and logz +/- nan. Library defect: project asserts on non-finite suff_stats and factor_step (optimiser.py:150) does not catch AssertionError, so one bad projection kills the run; no later commit touches the path. A local rerun at 66f9f8d5d converged in sweep 3 without failing (unseeded Dynesty, non-deterministic). Mind bug prompt draft/bug/autofit/ep_project_nonfinite_suff_stats_ic50_n50.md

      • +
    • 2026-09-09 — run —
      342411 failed — wall 0:38: ep_scale_up: EP scale ladder, sim rungs 5/10/25/50, nlive 150 max_steps 12 — finished 2026-09-09 23:19:29 BST (sacct COMPLETED 00:38:49, the ladder catches rung failures): rungs N=5/10/25 passed the global coef_m…show less

      342411 failed — wall 0:38: ep_scale_up: EP scale ladder, sim rungs 5/10/25/50, nlive 150 max_steps 12 — finished 2026-09-09 23:19:29 BST (sacct COMPLETED 00:38:49, the ladder catches rung failures): rungs N=5/10/25 passed the global coef_mean assertions; rung N=50 FAILED — AssertionError: assert np.isfinite(suff_stats).all() in autofit/messages/abstract.py:316 project (via mapper/prior/abstract.py:237), error.342411.err

      • +
    • 2026-09-09 — run —
      342412 finished — wall 0:07: ep_scale_up: graphical scale ladder, sim rungs 5/10/25/50, nlive 150 — COMPLETED 2026-09-09 22:48:42 BST (sacct 00:07:59): all four rungs N=5/10/25/50 passed the global coef_mean assertions (within 3σ); results…show less

      342412 finished — wall 0:07: ep_scale_up: graphical scale ladder, sim rungs 5/10/25/50, nlive 150 — COMPLETED 2026-09-09 22:48:42 BST (sacct 00:07:59): all four rungs N=5/10/25/50 passed the global coef_mean assertions (within 3σ); results/graphical_ladder_n*_summary.json

    full log

    -

    resume ic50_workspace

    - -
    -

    autolens_inference — Do the PyAutoLens inference backends agree on the HST SLaM posterior

    -

    active · both · autolens_inference#4 · projects/autolens_inference.md · local /home/jammy/Code/PyAutoLabs/lens/autolens_inference · RAL /mnt/ral/jnightin/inference/autolens_inference

    -

    Now

    -

    All pre-likelihood-speedup SLaM HST rows (slam_base A100 dense/sparse, the 342695 rate probe, delaunay_1250 A100 dense/sparse 343143/343145) are archived under results|output/archive/2026-09-24_pre_likelihood_speedup/ (autolens_inference#12). Running since 2026-09-24 on today's library mains: slam_base A100 dense 350674 / sparse 350675, delaunay_1250 A100 dense 350678 / sparse 350679, and the first CPU leg, slam_base numba_cpu sparse 350682 on ral; seeds 0-1 each. Next: pull the rows, commit them live, and read the new-vs-archived per-stage walls as the inference-level speedup; then the fixed-lens-light variant resumes from these output trees.

    -

    Runs

    -
      -
    • 350674_[0-1] — running — gpu — 2026-09-24 — slam_hst_base: A100 leg, dense inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_hst_jax_gpu_dense (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_dense_fp64, variant slam_base) — re-r…
      • -
    • 350675_[0-1] — running — gpu — 2026-09-24 — slam_hst_base: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64, variant slam_base) — r…
      • -
    • 350678_[0-1] — running — gpu — 2026-09-24 — slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, dense inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_dense (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_dense_fp64, var…
      • -
    • 350679_[0-1] — running — gpu — 2026-09-24 — slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64,…
      • -
    • 350682_[0-1] — running — ral — 2026-09-24 — slam_hst_base: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, 8 cpus, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_sparse_fp64, varia…
      • -
    • 350684_[0-1] — running — ral — 2026-09-24 — slam_hst_delaunay_1250: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_spar…
      • -
    -

    Last 5

    -
      -
    • 2026-09-24 — run — 350684_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_delaunay_1250: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_sparse_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) on the post-speedup libr…
      • -
    • 2026-09-24 — run — 350682_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_base: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, 8 cpus, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_sparse_fp64, variant slam_base), 5-day containment — first CPU leg of the…
      • -
    • 2026-09-24 — run — 350679_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) — re-run on the post-speedup libr…
      • -
    • 2026-09-24 — run — 350678_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, dense inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_dense (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_dense_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) — re-run on the post-speedup library…
      • -
    • 2026-09-24 — run — 350675_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_base: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64, variant slam_base) — re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5,…
      • +

      active · ral · PyAutoCortex#36

      +
    +
+
+
+

autolens_inference

Do the PyAutoLens inference backends agree on the HST SLaM posterior6 running · 0 open · updated 2026-09-24 +
+
+
Registered:
not recorded
+
Local:
/home/jammy/Code/PyAutoLabs/lens/autolens_inference
+
RAL:
/mnt/ral/jnightin/inference/autolens_inference
+
+

Current position

+

All pre-likelihood-speedup SLaM HST rows (slam_base A100 dense/sparse, the 342695 rate probe, delaunay_1250 A100 dense/sparse 343143/343145) are archived under results|output/archive/2026-09-24_pre_likelihood_speedup/ (autolens_inference#12). Running since 2026-09-24 on today's library mains: slam_base A100 dense 350674 / sparse 350675, delaunay_1250 A100 dense 350678 / sparse 350679, and the first CPU leg, slam_base numba_cpu sparse 350682 on ral; seeds 0-1 each. Next: pull the rows, commit them live, and read the new-vs-archived per-stage walls as the inference-level speedup; then the fixed-lens-light variant resumes from these output trees.

+ +
+

Runs (6)

+ + + + + + + + + + +
JobStatePartitionDateDescription
350674_[0-1]runninggpu2026-09-24
slam_hst_base: A100 leg, dense inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_hst_jax_gpu_dense (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_dense_fp64, variant slam_base) — re-r…show less

slam_hst_base: A100 leg, dense inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_hst_jax_gpu_dense (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_dense_fp64, variant slam_base) — re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5, Lens 86054bbc1, Fit dd9fbe0aa, Galaxy 70a61e26, Nerves 1fa613a);
old tree archived so nothing resumes;
kept at the normal path for the fixed-lens-light resume variant

350675_[0-1]runninggpu2026-09-24
slam_hst_base: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64, variant slam_base) — r…show less

slam_hst_base: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64, variant slam_base) — re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5, Lens 86054bbc1, Fit dd9fbe0aa, Galaxy 70a61e26, Nerves 1fa613a);
old tree archived so nothing resumes;
kept at the normal path for the fixed-lens-light resume variant

350678_[0-1]runninggpu2026-09-24
slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, dense inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_dense (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_dense_fp64, var…show less

slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, dense inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_dense (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_dense_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) — re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5, Lens 86054bbc1, Fit dd9fbe0aa, Galaxy 70a61e26, Nerves 1fa613a);
old tree archived so nothing resumes;
kept at the normal path for the fixed-lens-light resume variant

350679_[0-1]runninggpu2026-09-24
slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64,…show less

slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) — re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5, Lens 86054bbc1, Fit dd9fbe0aa, Galaxy 70a61e26, Nerves 1fa613a);
old tree archived so nothing resumes;
kept at the normal path for the fixed-lens-light resume variant

350682_[0-1]runningral2026-09-24
slam_hst_base: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, 8 cpus, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_sparse_fp64, varia…show less

slam_hst_base: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, 8 cpus, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_sparse_fp64, variant slam_base), 5-day containment — first CPU leg of the parity row;
re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5, Lens 86054bbc1, Fit dd9fbe0aa, Galaxy 70a61e26, Nerves 1fa613a);
old tree archived so nothing resumes;
kept at the normal path for the fixed-lens-light resume variant

350684_[0-1]runningral2026-09-24
slam_hst_delaunay_1250: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_spar…show less

slam_hst_delaunay_1250: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_sparse_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) on the post-speedup library mains;
euclid test-mode witness passed 2026-09-24

+
Recent log — 5 of 16 entries +
    +
  • 2026-09-24 — run —
    350684_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_delaunay_1250: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_sparse_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) on the post-speedup libr…show less

    350684_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_delaunay_1250: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_sparse_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) on the post-speedup library mains; euclid test-mode witness passed 2026-09-24

    • +
  • 2026-09-24 — run —
    350682_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_base: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, 8 cpus, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_sparse_fp64, variant slam_base), 5-day containment — first CPU leg of the…show less

    350682_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_base: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, 8 cpus, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_sparse_fp64, variant slam_base), 5-day containment — first CPU leg of the parity row; re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5, Lens 86054bbc1, Fit dd9fbe0aa, Galaxy 70a61e26, Nerves 1fa613a); old tree archived so nothing resumes; kept at the normal path for the fixed-lens-light resume variant

    • +
  • 2026-09-24 — run —
    350679_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) — re-run on the post-speedup libr…show less

    350679_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) — re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5, Lens 86054bbc1, Fit dd9fbe0aa, Galaxy 70a61e26, Nerves 1fa613a); old tree archived so nothing resumes; kept at the normal path for the fixed-lens-light resume variant

    • +
  • 2026-09-24 — run —
    350678_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, dense inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_dense (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_dense_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) — re-run on the post-speedup library…show less

    350678_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, dense inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_dense (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_dense_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) — re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5, Lens 86054bbc1, Fit dd9fbe0aa, Galaxy 70a61e26, Nerves 1fa613a); old tree archived so nothing resumes; kept at the normal path for the fixed-lens-light resume variant

    • +
  • 2026-09-24 — run —
    350675_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_base: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64, variant slam_base) — re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5,…show less

    350675_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_base: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64, variant slam_base) — re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5, Lens 86054bbc1, Fit dd9fbe0aa, Galaxy 70a61e26, Nerves 1fa613a); old tree archived so nothing resumes; kept at the normal path for the fixed-lens-light resume variant

full log

-

resume autolens_inference

- -
-

autofit_inference — PyAutoFit search benchmark on gaussian_x3: which searches find the right answer fastest

-

active · ral · autofit_inference#8 · projects/autofit_inference.md · local /home/jammy/Code/PyAutoLabs/fit/autofit_inference · RAL /mnt/ral/jnightin/inference/autofit_inference

-

Now

-

Wave 2 closed and judged under gaussian_x3@2 (B5b-2, 2026-10-15): all 12,750 pulled rows admitted at PyAutoFit pin df6d218f10cd; of the 13,000 expected runs, 11,580 rows + 1,170 failed + 0 missing + 250 deferred. The 409930 probe-first legs close: NSS 50-step leads both evidence rankings (blend 158/250, separated 210/250); Zeus JAX is 0/250 on the blend and 190/250 on the separated control (first among separated posterior legs). The catalogue ranks only legs with success rate >= 50 % over >= 20 attempts and lists the rest as unreliable (post-hoc presentation convention, protocol §8 note; autofit_inference#12 ruling 2). Summary records published as inference-summary@3 (101 record shards). Next: after the B5b-2 PRs merge, capture the Insight fit snapshot from main under @3 and run pyauto-insight check online; then B5c (a second model family).

-

Runs

-

nothing on the cluster

-

Last 5

-
    -
  • 2026-10-15 — run — 409930_[0-19] finished — wall 1:30: wave-2 probe-first remainder (B5b): Zeus JAX + NSS n_live_200_mcmc_steps_50, both datasets, 980 runs after the probe under probe-derived @2 timeouts (NSS 600 s, Zeus 1168 s); %20; submit_wave2_remainder;…
    • +

    active · both · autolens_inference#4

    +
+
+
+
+

autofit_inference

PyAutoFit search benchmark on gaussian_x3: which searches find the right answer fastest0 running · 1 open · updated 2026-10-15 +
+
+
Registered:
2026-10-08
+
Local:
/home/jammy/Code/PyAutoLabs/fit/autofit_inference
+
RAL:
/mnt/ral/jnightin/inference/autofit_inference
+
+

Current position

+

B5c (2026-10-15, autofit_inference#14): a second model family, correlated_nd (correlated Gaussians D = 20/50/100, condition number 10^3, and a D = 20 hybrid Rosenbrock banana, exact posteriors and ln Z), pre-registered as correlated_nd@1 (first committed 9ec37795f404; amendment A1 before any row) with seeded datasets and eight exact references that pass the section 6 agreement test. Its 930-run pilot is RAL 409957 on --partition=ral at the pin df6d218f10cd; it ranks nothing and is catalogued apart from gaussian_x3 (nothing ranked across families). gaussian_x3 wave 2 stays closed and judged under gaussian_x3@2. Next: B5c-2 pulls the pilot (results/ only), judges it under @1, freezes correlated_nd@2 and submits the scored wave.

+ +
+

Runs (1)

+ + + + + +
JobStatePartitionDateDescription
409957_[0-929]openral2026-10-15
correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family;
protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cel…show less

correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family;
protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells over corr_gaussian_d20/d50/d100 + rosenbrock_d20, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100;
submit_correlated_nd_pilot;
pin df6d218f10cd;
pulled in B5c-2

+
Recent log — 5 of 24 entries +
    +
  • 2026-10-15 — run —
    409957_[0-929] submitted: correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family; protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells over corr_gaussian_d20/d50/d100 + rosenbrock_d20, o…show less

    409957_[0-929] submitted: correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family; protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells over corr_gaussian_d20/d50/d100 + rosenbrock_d20, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100; submit_correlated_nd_pilot; pin df6d218f10cd; pulled in B5c-2

    • +
  • 2026-10-15 — run —
    409930_[0-19] finished — wall 1:30: wave-2 probe-first remainder (B5b): Zeus JAX + NSS n_live_200_mcmc_steps_50, both datasets, 980 runs after the probe under probe-derived @2 timeouts (NSS 600 s, Zeus 1168 s); %20; submit_wave2_remainder;…show less

    409930_[0-19] finished — wall 1:30: wave-2 probe-first remainder (B5b): Zeus JAX + NSS n_live_200_mcmc_steps_50, both datasets, 980 runs after the probe under probe-derived @2 timeouts (NSS 600 s, Zeus 1168 s); %20; submit_wave2_remainder; pin df6d218f10cd; pulled in B5b-2 — 20/20 COMPLETED (16:08-17:38 UTC); 980 remainder rows pulled by per-directory tar (20 probe rows byte-identical); all admitted under gaussian_x3@2, 0 missing; judged B5b-2

  • 2026-10-15 — run — 408367_[0-389] finished — wall 1:57: scored wave 2 separated jax_cpu: 3750 runs, %60, afterany 408346:408347 — 390/390 COMPLETED; 3750 separated jax_cpu rows admitted; judged B5b
  • 2026-10-15 — run — 408366_[0-379] finished — wall 1:51: scored wave 2 separated numpy: 2250 runs, %60, afterany 408346:408347 — 380/380 COMPLETED; 2250 separated numpy rows admitted; judged B5b
  • 2026-10-15 — run — 408365_[0-344] finished — wall 1:46: scored wave 2 blend jax_cpu: 3500 runs, %60, afterany 408346:408347 — 345/345 COMPLETED; 3500 blend jax_cpu rows admitted; judged B5b
    • -
  • 2026-10-15 — run — 408348_[0-379] finished — wall 1:53: scored wave 2 (gaussian_x3@2) blend numpy: 2250 runs, 50 seeds x 5 realisations, %60, afterany 408346:408347; submit_wave2_scored_gaussian_x3_blend_numpy — 380/380 COMPLETED; 2250 blend numpy rows admit…

full log

-

resume autofit_inference

- -
-

euclid — The original Euclid DR1 grade-AB catalogue project, superseded by euclid_dr1

-

dormant · both · no issue yet · projects/euclid.md · local /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/euclid · RAL /mnt/ral/jnightin/active/euclid

-

Now

-

Dormant: superseded by euclid_dr1 (euclid_dr1_prelim is defunct). The tree is kept under Science/active and RAL `active/euclid` (category layout, 2026-10-15); no question is open.

-

Runs

+

active · ral · autofit_inference#8

+
+
+
+
+

euclid

The original Euclid DR1 grade-AB catalogue project, superseded by euclid_dr1dormant · no runs recorded · updated 2026-10-15 +
+
+
Registered:
not recorded
+
Local:
/mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/euclid
+
RAL:
/mnt/ral/jnightin/active/euclid
+
+

Current position

+

Dormant: superseded by euclid_dr1 (euclid_dr1_prelim is defunct). The tree is kept under Science/active and RAL `active/euclid` (category layout, 2026-10-15); no question is open.

+
+

Runs (0)

nothing on the cluster

-

Last 5

-
    +
    Recent log — 4 of 4 entries +
    • 2026-10-15 — note — superseded by euclid_dr1 (euclid_dr1_prelim defunct) per the human; stays dormant; folder under Science/active and RAL active/; ral_root repointed to the category layout (PyAutoCortex#67)
    • 2026-08-28 — note — question: Do we recover Sersic indices or is prior pile-up artefact — planned, never run [archive/tasks/euclid/sersic_index_recovery.md]
    • 2026-08-28 — note — question: Can a fitted Euclid lens be resimulated and recovered — planned, never run [archive/tasks/euclid/resimulate_fitted_lens_simulator.md]
    • 2026-08-28 — note — question: How robust are magnification estimates under model match and mismatch — planned, never run [archive/tasks/euclid/magnification_robustness.md]

    full log

    - +

    dormant · both · no issue yet

    +
    +
+
5 retired
  • inference_programme — The first inference programme, retired and restarted as autolens_inference — retired 2026-09-07: restarting from scratch: the project setup was unsatisfactory and it informed how the Cortex manages projects; RAL outputs stashed at /mnt/ral/jnightin/inference_programme_retired_2026-09-07
  • euclid_dr1_prelim — Refit the ten DR1-prelim tiles and rebuild the catalogue on RAL — retired 2026-09-25: retire euclid_dr1_prelim; tree moved to z_vault by the human
    • diff --git a/dashboard.md b/dashboard.md index 9c27cc8..d7f783c 100644 --- a/dashboard.md +++ b/dashboard.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ One ledger per science project: what is on the cluster right now, what the human | Where | Count | |-------|------:| | [Running](#projects) | 22 | -| [Open](#projects) | 47 | +| [Open](#projects) | 48 | | [Projects](#projects) | 9 |
    📋 check in since last time @@ -50,30 +50,54 @@ Last check-in: 2026-09-30T09:51Z. | slope_hierarchy_scale | 0 | 0 | 2026-10-14 | | ic50_workspace | 0 | 0 | 2026-10-14 | | autolens_inference | 6 | 0 | 2026-09-24 | -| autofit_inference | 0 | 0 | 2026-10-15 | +| autofit_inference | 0 | 1 | 2026-10-15 | ## Projects -### subhalo_validation — Do the SLaM subhalo pipelines false-detect on lenses with no subhalo +
    subhalo_validation — Do the SLaM subhalo pipelines false-detect on lenses with no subhalo · 0 running · 5 open · updated 2026-09-07 -active · ral · [subhalo_validation#2](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/subhalo_validation/issues/2) · [projects/subhalo_validation.md](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/subhalo_validation.md) · local `/mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/subhalo_validation` · RAL `/mnt/ral/jnightin/active/subhalo_validation` +**Registered:** not recorded -**Now** +**Local:** `` /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/subhalo_validation `` + +**RAL:** `` /mnt/ral/jnightin/active/subhalo_validation `` + +**Current position** Five chains on RAL under the corrected adapt settings: rectangular_adapt on pl_eff_0 / pl_eff_1_outer (job A done, job B 342311 submitted) and the delaunay_adapt_split reruns plus rectangular_adapt on pl_sersic_0. pl_sersic_0 on delaunay_adapt_split is accepted (no false detection, +2.557). Next: pull when the numba chains land and read the evidence_increase of each; no more 1000-pixel runs. -**Runs** +
    📋 + +``` +Use the cortex skill. — resume subhalo_validation: read PyAutoCortex projects/subhalo_validation.md (Now, Runs, Log) and then /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/subhalo_validation/wiki/project/state.md and the assistant autolens_assistant's AGENTS.md; tell me where I left off and what I said I would do next. Submit nothing and log nothing until I say. +``` + +
    + +**Runs** (5) -- 342299_1 — open — ral — 2026-09-07 — delaunay_adapt_split_pl_eff_0: job B, numba chain at the standard 1250-pixel Delaunay mesh (8c / 96gb / 48 h); reloads job A 342231_1; the 09-07 ruling: run al… -- 342299_2 — open — ral — 2026-09-07 — delaunay_adapt_split_pl_eff_1_outer: job B, numba chain at the standard 1250-pixel Delaunay mesh (8c / 96gb / 48 h); reloads job A 342231_2; the 09-07 ruling:… -- 342311_1 — open — ral — 2026-09-07 — rectangular_adapt_pl_eff_0: job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt; reloads job A 342237_1; the… -- 342311_2 — open — ral — 2026-09-07 — rectangular_adapt_pl_eff_1_outer: job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt; reloads job A 342237_… -- 342311_0 — open — ral — 2026-09-07 — rectangular_adapt_pl_sersic_0: job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt; reloads job A 342237_0;… +| Job | State | Partition | Date | Description | +|---|---|---|---|---| +| `342299_1` | open | ral | 2026-09-07 | delaunay_adapt_split_pl_eff_0: job B, numba chain at the standard 1250-pixel Delaunay mesh (8c / 96gb / 48 h); reloads job A 342231_1; the 09-07 ruling: run al… | +| `342299_2` | open | ral | 2026-09-07 | delaunay_adapt_split_pl_eff_1_outer: job B, numba chain at the standard 1250-pixel Delaunay mesh (8c / 96gb / 48 h); reloads job A 342231_2; the 09-07 ruling:… | +| `342311_1` | open | ral | 2026-09-07 | rectangular_adapt_pl_eff_0: job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt; reloads job A 342237_1; the… | +| `342311_2` | open | ral | 2026-09-07 | rectangular_adapt_pl_eff_1_outer: job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt; reloads job A 342237_… | +| `342311_0` | open | ral | 2026-09-07 | rectangular_adapt_pl_sersic_0: job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt; reloads job A 342237_0;… | -**Last 5** +
    Full descriptions (5 shortened above) -- 2026-09-07 — *result* — accepted delaunay_adapt_split_pl_sersic_0 (R-20260907-01): Accepted. The numba delaunay_adapt_split chain on pl_sersic_0 (job 342273_0, 22 h 08 m, 1250 Hilbert / 1310 Delaunay pixels) lands evidence_increase +2.557 (< 5): no false detectio… +- `342299_1` — delaunay_adapt_split_pl_eff_0: job B, numba chain at the standard 1250-pixel Delaunay mesh (8c / 96gb / 48 h); reloads job A 342231_1; the 09-07 ruling: run all datasets at 1250, no more pix1000 +- `342299_2` — delaunay_adapt_split_pl_eff_1_outer: job B, numba chain at the standard 1250-pixel Delaunay mesh (8c / 96gb / 48 h); reloads job A 342231_2; the 09-07 ruling: run all datasets at 1250, no more pix1000 +- `342311_1` — rectangular_adapt_pl_eff_0: job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt; reloads job A 342237_1; the 09-07 ask: submit the rectangular runs too +- `342311_2` — rectangular_adapt_pl_eff_1_outer: job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt; reloads job A 342237_2; the 09-07 ask: submit the rectangular runs too +- `342311_0` — rectangular_adapt_pl_sersic_0: job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt; reloads job A 342237_0; the 09-07 ask: submit the rectangular runs too + +
    + +
    Recent log — 5 of 40 entries + +- 2026-09-07 — *result* — accepted delaunay_adapt_split_pl_sersic_0 (R-20260907-01): Accepted. The numba delaunay_adapt_split chain on pl_sersic_0 (job 342273_0, 22 h 08 m, 1250 Hilbert / 1310 Delaunay pixels) lands evidence_increase +2.557 (< 5): no false detection. The best cell parks a 1.6e6 Msun nuisance subhalo at (-1.43, -2.36)", outside the ring. The shift from the legacy -0.30 comes with the S/N-3 adapt cap, adaptive over-sampling and the numba pool, not a code fault. Results are good; run the remaining datasets at 1250 pixels; no more 1000-pixel runs. - 2026-09-07 — *run* — 342311_0 submitted: rectangular_adapt_pl_sersic_0 — job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt; reloads job A 342237_0; the 09-07 ask: submit the rectangular runs too - 2026-09-07 — *run* — 342311_2 submitted: rectangular_adapt_pl_eff_1_outer — job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt; reloads job A 342237_2; the 09-07 ask: submit the rectangular runs too - 2026-09-07 — *run* — 342311_1 submitted: rectangular_adapt_pl_eff_0 — job B, numba chain (8c / 96gb / 48 h) at the standard 1250-pixel mesh under PIPELINE=rectangular_adapt; reloads job A 342237_1; the 09-07 ask: submit the rectangular runs too @@ -81,120 +105,61 @@ Next: pull when the numba chains land and read the evidence_increase of each; no [full log](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/subhalo_validation.md) -
    📋 resume subhalo_validation +active · ral · [subhalo_validation#2](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/subhalo_validation/issues/2) -``` -Use the cortex skill. — resume subhalo_validation: read PyAutoCortex projects/subhalo_validation.md (Now, Runs, Log) and then /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/subhalo_validation/wiki/project/state.md and the assistant autolens_assistant's AGENTS.md; tell me where I left off and what I said I would do next. Submit nothing and log nothing until I say. -``` +
    -### subhalo — SLaM subhalo modelling of the SLACS lens sample +
    subhalo — SLaM subhalo modelling of the SLACS lens sample · no runs recorded · updated 2026-10-15 -active · both · no issue yet · [projects/subhalo.md](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/subhalo.md) · local `/mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/subhalo` · RAL `/mnt/ral/jnightin/active/subhalo` +**Registered:** 2026-10-15 -**Now** +**Local:** `` /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/subhalo `` -Registered 2026-10-15 (PyAutoCortex#67): SLACS sample under dataset/, output/ empty, no runs yet; ral_root not yet created on RAL — the first hpc/sync push creates it. +**RAL:** `` /mnt/ral/jnightin/active/subhalo `` -**Runs** +**Current position** -- _nothing on the cluster_ +SLACS sample under dataset/, output/ empty, no runs yet; ral_root not yet created on RAL — the first hpc/sync push creates it. -**Last 5** +
    📋 + +``` +Use the cortex skill. — resume subhalo: read PyAutoCortex projects/subhalo.md (Now, Runs, Log) and then /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/subhalo/README.md and the assistant autolens_assistant's AGENTS.md; tell me where I left off and what I said I would do next. Submit nothing and log nothing until I say. +``` + +
    + +**Runs** (0) + +_nothing on the cluster_ + +
    Recent log — 1 of 1 entry - 2026-10-15 — *note* — ledger opened [full log](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/subhalo.md) -
    📋 resume subhalo +active · both · no issue yet -``` -Use the cortex skill. — resume subhalo: read PyAutoCortex projects/subhalo.md (Now, Runs, Log) and then /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/subhalo/README.md and the assistant autolens_assistant's AGENTS.md; tell me where I left off and what I said I would do next. Submit nothing and log nothing until I say. -``` +
    -### euclid_dr1 — Does the sep1 DR1 delivery reproduce the ten prelim lenses by eye +
    euclid_dr1 — Does the sep1 DR1 delivery reproduce the ten prelim lenses by eye · 16 running · 42 open · updated 2026-10-10 -active · ral · no issue yet · [projects/euclid_dr1.md](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/euclid_dr1.md) · local `/mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/euclid_dr1` · RAL `/mnt/ral/jnightin/euclid_dr1` +**Registered:** 2026-09-11 -**Now** +**Local:** `` /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/euclid_dr1 `` -The top-1000 DR1 sep1 vis_lp array finished 971 of 1000; 29 hit the 18-hour walltime. Array 344645 is now running vis_pix with the Numba CPU sparse route for those 971 completed lenses only. +**RAL:** `` /mnt/ral/jnightin/euclid_dr1 `` -**Runs** - -- 342650 — open — ral — 2026-09-11 — euclid_dr1 sep1 reproduction: the ten euclid_dr1_prelim lenses refitted from the sep1 delivery through prelim's route (hpc/batch_cpu/submit_initial_lens_model_… -- 345279 — running — ral — 2026-09-20 — VIS-LP JAX CPU pilot for the nine remainder tiles completing the first ten sorted DR1 lenses; single RGB thumbnails uploaded -- 345305 — running — ral — 2026-09-20 — DR1 full vis_lp production batch 1/5: rest_01, 1000 lenses, output root dr1_full -- 345669 — open — ral — 2026-09-20 — DR1 full vis_lp production batch 2/5: rest_02, 1000 lenses, output root dr1_full -- 345670 — open — ral — 2026-09-20 — DR1 full vis_lp production batch 3/5: rest_03, 1000 lenses, output root dr1_full -- 345671 — open — ral — 2026-09-20 — DR1 full vis_lp production batch 4/5: rest_04, 1000 lenses, output root dr1_full -- 345672 — open — ral — 2026-09-20 — DR1 full vis_lp production batch 5/5: rest_05, 1000 lenses, output root dr1_full -- 349353 — open — ral — 2026-09-21 — 100-tile dr1_sep1_rest SED array: Sersic VIS with lens-light n~Uniform(0.5,10.0), then NIR Y/J/H and EXT DECam g/r/i/z; output_sed; max 20 concurrent -- 350581 — open — ral — 2026-09-23 — vis_lp-only inspection bundle over 4,912 completed dr1_sep1_rest tiles (vislp_full_20260923, OUTPUT_DIR=dr1_full, single 24 h CPU job) -- 350804 — running — ral — 2026-09-25 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest priority-250 vis_lp array (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_prio250), 0-249, manifest hpc/run_manifests/positions_priority_250.txt, positions finder 2.1 pos… -- 351085 — running — ral — 2026-09-25 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest next-5000 vis_lp batch 1/5 (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_n5k_p01), 1000 lenses, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_next5000_20260925_part01.txt -- 351086 — running — ral — 2026-09-25 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest next-5000 vis_lp batch 2/5 (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_n5k_p02), 1000 lenses, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_next5000_20260925_part02.txt -- 351087 — running — ral — 2026-09-25 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest next-5000 vis_lp batch 3/5 (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_n5k_p03), 1000 lenses, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_next5000_20260925_part03.txt -- 351088 — running — ral — 2026-09-25 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest next-5000 vis_lp batch 4/5 (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_n5k_p04), 1000 lenses, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_next5000_20260925_part04.txt -- 351089 — running — ral — 2026-09-25 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest next-5000 vis_lp batch 5/5 (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_n5k_p05), 1000 lenses, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_next5000_20260925_part05.txt -- 351090 — open — ral — 2026-09-25 — DR1 priority-250 vis_pix array (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_prio250), 0-249, dependency afterany:350804 -- 351091 — open — ral — 2026-09-25 — DR1 priority-250 SED array (euclid_dr1_sed_prio250), 0-249 max 60 concurrent, output_sed, dependency afterany:351090 -- 356227 — running — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 priority-250 vis_pix by-eye test: tasks 0-9 of submit_initial_lens_model_vis_pix_priority250 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_prio250_test10), no dependency; full array… -- 356319 — running — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 priority-250 SED rerun, tasks 0-9: the ten tiles with no EXT/DECam imaging, VIS + NIR Y/J/H only (euclid_dr1_sed_prio250_nironly); SED scripts no longer re… -- 356390 — open — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 01/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=01): 992 lenses whose 351085 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pi… -- 356447 — open — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 02/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=02): 996 lenses whose 351086 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pi… -- 356448 — open — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 03/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=03): 997 lenses whose 351087 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pi… -- 356449 — open — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 04/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=04): 996 lenses whose 351088 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pi… -- 356450 — open — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 05/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=05): 994 lenses whose 351089 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pi… -- 356451 — open — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 next-5000 SED part 01/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=01): same 992-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part01.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_s… -- 356452 — open — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 next-5000 SED part 02/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=02): same 996-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part02.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_s… -- 356453 — open — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 next-5000 SED part 03/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=03): same 997-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part03.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_s… -- 356555 — open — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 next-5000 SED part 04/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=04): same 996-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part04.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_s… -- 356556 — open — ral — 2026-09-26 — DR1 next-5000 SED part 05/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=05): same 994-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part05.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_s… -- 374848 — open — ral — 2026-09-30 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 01/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 998 tiles whose vis_lp 366938 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_… -- 374849 — open — ral — 2026-09-30 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 02/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 998 tiles whose vis_lp 367039 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_… -- 374850 — open — ral — 2026-09-30 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 03/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 995 tiles whose vis_lp 367141 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_… -- 374851 — open — ral — 2026-09-30 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 04/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 995 tiles whose vis_lp 367243 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_… -- 374852 — open — ral — 2026-09-30 — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 05/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 996 tiles whose vis_lp 367244 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_… -- 377038 — open — ral — 2026-09-30 — DR1 rest-batch vis_pix part 02/4 dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_rest_p02): 945 single-task jobs ids 377038-377987, afterok:375701_N each (indices 0-944)… -- 377988 — open — ral — 2026-09-30 — DR1 rest-batch vis_pix part 03/4 dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_rest_p03): 945 single-task jobs ids 377988-378936, afterok:375702_N each (indices 0-944)… -- 378940 — open — ral — 2026-09-30 — DR1 rest-batch vis_pix part 04/4 dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_rest_p04): 944 single-task jobs ids 378940-379889, afterok:375703_N each (indices 0-943)… -- 384040 — running — ral — 2026-10-01 — DR1 dr1_v2_new sep28 eclipse new_ab vis_lp (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_sep28_p01), 987 tiles (942 dr1_v2_new_cutouts_needed + 45 re-centred cut-outs; 48+21 dr1_sep1 dup… -- 384046 — running — ral — 2026-10-01 — DR1 dr1_v2_new sep28 vis_pix dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_sep28_p01): 987 single-task jobs ids 384046-385042, each --array=N --dependency=afterok:3840… -- 388367 — open — ral — 2026-10-03 — DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r01): 944 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_… -- 388368 — open — ral — 2026-10-03 — DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r02): 938 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_… -- 388369 — open — ral — 2026-10-03 — DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r03): 943 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_… -- 388370 — open — ral — 2026-10-03 — DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r04): 939 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_… -- 388371 — open — ral — 2026-10-03 — DR1 missing-SED sweep dr1_v2_new (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_v2new): 303 sep28 tiles with completed vis_lp 384040 — first SED on non-DECam ground bands (HSC/MegaCam/P… -- 388372 — open — ral — 2026-10-03 — DR1 missing-SED retry probe (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_retry): tasks 0-49 of 1,252 earlier SED TIMEOUT/FAILED/partial tiles, manifest sed_missing_20261003_retry.txt,… -- 398270 — open — ral — 2026-10-08 — DR1 dr1_sep1 ex-top1000 vis_pix chained on vis_lp 397467 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_ex_top1000_p01): immediate array 398270 over 256 lenses whose vis_lp had completed… -- 400282 — open — ral — 2026-10-09 — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p01): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move… -- 400308 — open — ral — 2026-10-09 — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p02): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move… -- 400309 — open — ral — 2026-10-09 — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p03): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move… -- 400310 — open — ral — 2026-10-09 — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p04): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move… -- 402719 — running — ral — 2026-10-10 — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p01): indices 697-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part01.txt, replacing 400282's cancelled pending task… -- 402720 — running — ral — 2026-10-10 — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p02): indices 527-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part02.txt, replacing 400308's cancelled pending task… -- 402721 — running — ral — 2026-10-10 — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p03): indices 363-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part03.txt, replacing 400309's cancelled pending task… -- 402722 — running — ral — 2026-10-10 — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p04): indices 803-862 of sed_fill_20261009/part04.txt, replacing 400310's cancelled pending task… -- 402909 — open — ral — 2026-10-10 — DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p01): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part01.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed… -- 402910 — open — ral — 2026-10-10 — DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p02): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part02.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed… -- 402911 — open — ral — 2026-10-10 — DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p03): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part03.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed… -- 402912 — open — ral — 2026-10-10 — DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p04): indices 0-862 of sed_fill_20261009/part04.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed… - -**Last 5** - -- 2026-10-10 — *run* — 402912 submitted: DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p04): indices 0-862 of sed_fill_20261009/part04.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/… -- 2026-10-10 — *run* — 402911 submitted: DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p03): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part03.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/… -- 2026-10-10 — *run* — 402910 submitted: DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p02): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part02.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/… -- 2026-10-10 — *run* — 402909 submitted: DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p01): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part01.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/… -- 2026-10-10 — *run* — 400314 failed: DR1 SED fill 3 pass 2 (retry) part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_retry_p04): same script and manifest part04.txt, afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 and the old fill 397469/70/71/74; complete tiles exit at once, so… +**Current position** -[full log](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/euclid_dr1.md) +The top-1000 DR1 sep1 vis_lp array finished 971 of 1000; 29 hit the 18-hour walltime. Array 344645 is now running vis_pix with the Numba CPU sparse route for those 971 completed lenses only. -
    📋 resume euclid_dr1 +
    📋 ``` Use the cortex skill. — resume euclid_dr1: read PyAutoCortex projects/euclid_dr1.md (Now, Runs, Log) and then /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/euclid_dr1/wiki/project/state.md and the assistant autolens_assistant's AGENTS.md; tell me where I left off and what I said I would do next. Submit nothing and log nothing until I say. @@ -202,204 +167,416 @@ Use the cortex skill. — resume euclid_dr1: read PyAutoCortex projects/euclid_d
    -### analytic_gaussian — Graphical and EP against a closed-form Gaussian posterior, at ensemble scale +**Runs** (58) + +| Job | State | Partition | Date | Description | +|---|---|---|---|---| +| `342650` | open | ral | 2026-09-11 | euclid_dr1 sep1 reproduction: the ten euclid_dr1_prelim lenses refitted from the sep1 delivery through prelim's route (hpc/batch_cpu/submit_initial_lens_model_… | +| `345279` | running | ral | 2026-09-20 | VIS-LP JAX CPU pilot for the nine remainder tiles completing the first ten sorted DR1 lenses; single RGB thumbnails uploaded | +| `345305` | running | ral | 2026-09-20 | DR1 full vis_lp production batch 1/5: rest_01, 1000 lenses, output root dr1_full | +| `345669` | open | ral | 2026-09-20 | DR1 full vis_lp production batch 2/5: rest_02, 1000 lenses, output root dr1_full | +| `345670` | open | ral | 2026-09-20 | DR1 full vis_lp production batch 3/5: rest_03, 1000 lenses, output root dr1_full | +| `345671` | open | ral | 2026-09-20 | DR1 full vis_lp production batch 4/5: rest_04, 1000 lenses, output root dr1_full | +| `345672` | open | ral | 2026-09-20 | DR1 full vis_lp production batch 5/5: rest_05, 1000 lenses, output root dr1_full | +| `349353` | open | ral | 2026-09-21 | 100-tile dr1_sep1_rest SED array: Sersic VIS with lens-light n~Uniform(0.5,10.0), then NIR Y/J/H and EXT DECam g/r/i/z; output_sed; max 20 concurrent | +| `350581` | open | ral | 2026-09-23 | vis_lp-only inspection bundle over 4,912 completed dr1_sep1_rest tiles (vislp_full_20260923, OUTPUT_DIR=dr1_full, single 24 h CPU job) | +| `350804` | running | ral | 2026-09-25 | DR1 dr1_sep1_rest priority-250 vis_lp array (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_prio250), 0-249, manifest hpc/run_manifests/positions_priority_250.txt, positions finder 2.1 pos… | +| `351085` | running | ral | 2026-09-25 | DR1 dr1_sep1_rest next-5000 vis_lp batch 1/5 (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_n5k_p01), 1000 lenses, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_next5000_20260925_part01.txt | +| `351086` | running | ral | 2026-09-25 | DR1 dr1_sep1_rest next-5000 vis_lp batch 2/5 (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_n5k_p02), 1000 lenses, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_next5000_20260925_part02.txt | +| `351087` | running | ral | 2026-09-25 | DR1 dr1_sep1_rest next-5000 vis_lp batch 3/5 (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_n5k_p03), 1000 lenses, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_next5000_20260925_part03.txt | +| `351088` | running | ral | 2026-09-25 | DR1 dr1_sep1_rest next-5000 vis_lp batch 4/5 (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_n5k_p04), 1000 lenses, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_next5000_20260925_part04.txt | +| `351089` | running | ral | 2026-09-25 | DR1 dr1_sep1_rest next-5000 vis_lp batch 5/5 (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_n5k_p05), 1000 lenses, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_next5000_20260925_part05.txt | +| `351090` | open | ral | 2026-09-25 | DR1 priority-250 vis_pix array (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_prio250), 0-249, dependency afterany:350804 | +| `351091` | open | ral | 2026-09-25 | DR1 priority-250 SED array (euclid_dr1_sed_prio250), 0-249 max 60 concurrent, output_sed, dependency afterany:351090 | +| `356227` | running | ral | 2026-09-26 | DR1 priority-250 vis_pix by-eye test: tasks 0-9 of submit_initial_lens_model_vis_pix_priority250 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_prio250_test10), no dependency; full array… | +| `356319` | running | ral | 2026-09-26 | DR1 priority-250 SED rerun, tasks 0-9: the ten tiles with no EXT/DECam imaging, VIS + NIR Y/J/H only (euclid_dr1_sed_prio250_nironly); SED scripts no longer re… | +| `356390` | open | ral | 2026-09-26 | DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 01/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=01): 992 lenses whose 351085 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pi… | +| `356447` | open | ral | 2026-09-26 | DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 02/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=02): 996 lenses whose 351086 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pi… | +| `356448` | open | ral | 2026-09-26 | DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 03/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=03): 997 lenses whose 351087 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pi… | +| `356449` | open | ral | 2026-09-26 | DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 04/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=04): 996 lenses whose 351088 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pi… | +| `356450` | open | ral | 2026-09-26 | DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 05/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=05): 994 lenses whose 351089 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pi… | +| `356451` | open | ral | 2026-09-26 | DR1 next-5000 SED part 01/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=01): same 992-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part01.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_s… | +| `356452` | open | ral | 2026-09-26 | DR1 next-5000 SED part 02/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=02): same 996-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part02.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_s… | +| `356453` | open | ral | 2026-09-26 | DR1 next-5000 SED part 03/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=03): same 997-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part03.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_s… | +| `356555` | open | ral | 2026-09-26 | DR1 next-5000 SED part 04/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=04): same 996-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part04.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_s… | +| `356556` | open | ral | 2026-09-26 | DR1 next-5000 SED part 05/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=05): same 994-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part05.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_s… | +| `374848` | open | ral | 2026-09-30 | DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 01/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 998 tiles whose vis_lp 366938 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_… | +| `374849` | open | ral | 2026-09-30 | DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 02/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 998 tiles whose vis_lp 367039 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_… | +| `374850` | open | ral | 2026-09-30 | DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 03/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 995 tiles whose vis_lp 367141 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_… | +| `374851` | open | ral | 2026-09-30 | DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 04/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 995 tiles whose vis_lp 367243 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_… | +| `374852` | open | ral | 2026-09-30 | DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 05/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 996 tiles whose vis_lp 367244 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_… | +| `377038` | open | ral | 2026-09-30 | DR1 rest-batch vis_pix part 02/4 dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_rest_p02): 945 single-task jobs ids 377038-377987, afterok:375701_N each (indices 0-944)… | +| `377988` | open | ral | 2026-09-30 | DR1 rest-batch vis_pix part 03/4 dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_rest_p03): 945 single-task jobs ids 377988-378936, afterok:375702_N each (indices 0-944)… | +| `378940` | open | ral | 2026-09-30 | DR1 rest-batch vis_pix part 04/4 dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_rest_p04): 944 single-task jobs ids 378940-379889, afterok:375703_N each (indices 0-943)… | +| `384040` | running | ral | 2026-10-01 | DR1 dr1_v2_new sep28 eclipse new_ab vis_lp (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_sep28_p01), 987 tiles (942 dr1_v2_new_cutouts_needed + 45 re-centred cut-outs; 48+21 dr1_sep1 dup… | +| `384046` | running | ral | 2026-10-01 | DR1 dr1_v2_new sep28 vis_pix dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_sep28_p01): 987 single-task jobs ids 384046-385042, each --array=N --dependency=afterok:3840… | +| `388367` | open | ral | 2026-10-03 | DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r01): 944 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_… | +| `388368` | open | ral | 2026-10-03 | DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r02): 938 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_… | +| `388369` | open | ral | 2026-10-03 | DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r03): 943 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_… | +| `388370` | open | ral | 2026-10-03 | DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r04): 939 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_… | +| `388371` | open | ral | 2026-10-03 | DR1 missing-SED sweep dr1_v2_new (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_v2new): 303 sep28 tiles with completed vis_lp 384040 — first SED on non-DECam ground bands (HSC/MegaCam/P… | +| `388372` | open | ral | 2026-10-03 | DR1 missing-SED retry probe (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_retry): tasks 0-49 of 1,252 earlier SED TIMEOUT/FAILED/partial tiles, manifest sed_missing_20261003_retry.txt,… | +| `398270` | open | ral | 2026-10-08 | DR1 dr1_sep1 ex-top1000 vis_pix chained on vis_lp 397467 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_ex_top1000_p01): immediate array 398270 over 256 lenses whose vis_lp had completed… | +| `400282` | open | ral | 2026-10-09 | DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p01): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move… | +| `400308` | open | ral | 2026-10-09 | DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p02): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move… | +| `400309` | open | ral | 2026-10-09 | DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p03): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move… | +| `400310` | open | ral | 2026-10-09 | DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p04): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move… | +| `402719` | running | ral | 2026-10-10 | DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p01): indices 697-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part01.txt, replacing 400282's cancelled pending task… | +| `402720` | running | ral | 2026-10-10 | DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p02): indices 527-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part02.txt, replacing 400308's cancelled pending task… | +| `402721` | running | ral | 2026-10-10 | DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p03): indices 363-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part03.txt, replacing 400309's cancelled pending task… | +| `402722` | running | ral | 2026-10-10 | DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p04): indices 803-862 of sed_fill_20261009/part04.txt, replacing 400310's cancelled pending task… | +| `402909` | open | ral | 2026-10-10 | DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p01): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part01.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed… | +| `402910` | open | ral | 2026-10-10 | DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p02): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part02.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed… | +| `402911` | open | ral | 2026-10-10 | DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p03): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part03.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed… | +| `402912` | open | ral | 2026-10-10 | DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p04): indices 0-862 of sed_fill_20261009/part04.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed… | + +
    Full descriptions (43 shortened above) + +- `342650` — euclid_dr1 sep1 reproduction: the ten euclid_dr1_prelim lenses refitted from the sep1 delivery through prelim's route (hpc/batch_cpu/submit_initial_lens_model_two_stage: vis_lp then vis_pix), array 0-9, wall budget 36:00; the by-eye reference is prelim run 342629 +- `350804` — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest priority-250 vis_lp array (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_prio250), 0-249, manifest hpc/run_manifests/positions_priority_250.txt, positions finder 2.1 positions +- `356227` — DR1 priority-250 vis_pix by-eye test: tasks 0-9 of submit_initial_lens_model_vis_pix_priority250 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_prio250_test10), no dependency; full array 351090 put on scontrol hold until the human has looked +- `356319` — DR1 priority-250 SED rerun, tasks 0-9: the ten tiles with no EXT/DECam imaging, VIS + NIR Y/J/H only (euclid_dr1_sed_prio250_nironly); SED scripts no longer refuse no-EXT tiles +- `356390` — DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 01/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=01): 992 lenses whose 351085 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part01.txt, array 0-991%100, 8 CPU/64 GB/18 h, no dependency +- `356447` — DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 02/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=02): 996 lenses whose 351086 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part02.txt, array 0-995%100, 8 CPU/64 GB/18 h, no dependency +- `356448` — DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 03/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=03): 997 lenses whose 351087 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part03.txt, array 0-996%100, 8 CPU/64 GB/18 h, no dependency +- `356449` — DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 04/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=04): 996 lenses whose 351088 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part04.txt, array 0-995%100, 8 CPU/64 GB/18 h, no dependency +- `356450` — DR1 next-5000 vis_pix part 05/05 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_n5k, PART=05): 994 lenses whose 351089 vis_lp log ended Finished vis_lp, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part05.txt, array 0-993%100, 8 CPU/64 GB/18 h, no dependency +- `356451` — DR1 next-5000 SED part 01/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=01): same 992-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part01.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_sed, array 0-991%60, 6 h, independent of vis_pix; no-EXT tiles fit VIS + NIR only +- `356452` — DR1 next-5000 SED part 02/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=02): same 996-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part02.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_sed, array 0-995%60, 6 h, independent of vis_pix; no-EXT tiles fit VIS + NIR only +- `356453` — DR1 next-5000 SED part 03/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=03): same 997-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part03.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_sed, array 0-996%60, 6 h, independent of vis_pix; no-EXT tiles fit VIS + NIR only +- `356555` — DR1 next-5000 SED part 04/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=04): same 996-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part04.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_sed, array 0-995%60, 6 h, independent of vis_pix; no-EXT tiles fit VIS + NIR only +- `356556` — DR1 next-5000 SED part 05/05 (euclid_dr1_sed_n5k, PART=05): same 994-lens manifest vis_pix_sed_next5000_20260926_part05.txt, vis_lp seed from output/, output_sed, array 0-993%60, 6 h, independent of vis_pix; no-EXT tiles fit VIS + NIR only +- `374848` — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 01/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 998 tiles whose vis_lp 366938 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_part01.txt, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, %40, partitions ral+gpu; ~18% TIMEOUT expected (Nautilus band hang) +- `374849` — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 02/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 998 tiles whose vis_lp 367039 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_part02.txt, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, %40, partitions ral+gpu; ~18% TIMEOUT expected (Nautilus band hang) +- `374850` — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 03/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 995 tiles whose vis_lp 367141 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_part03.txt, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, %40, partitions ral+gpu; ~18% TIMEOUT expected (Nautilus band hang) +- `374851` — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 04/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 995 tiles whose vis_lp 367243 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_part04.txt, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, %40, partitions ral+gpu; ~18% TIMEOUT expected (Nautilus band hang) +- `374852` — DR1 dr1_sep1_rest v2-grade SED chain batch 05/5 (euclid_dr1_sed_v2g), 996 tiles whose vis_lp 367244 completed, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_v2grade_20260930_part05.txt, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, %40, partitions ral+gpu; ~18% TIMEOUT expected (Nautilus band hang) +- `377038` — DR1 rest-batch vis_pix part 02/4 dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_rest_p02): 945 single-task jobs ids 377038-377987, afterok:375701_N each (indices 0-944); 8 CPU/16 GB/24 h, partitions ral+gpu; driver submit_vis_pix_rest_chain.sh +- `377988` — DR1 rest-batch vis_pix part 03/4 dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_rest_p03): 945 single-task jobs ids 377988-378936, afterok:375702_N each (indices 0-944); 8 CPU/16 GB/24 h, partitions ral+gpu; driver submit_vis_pix_rest_chain.sh +- `378940` — DR1 rest-batch vis_pix part 04/4 dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_rest_p04): 944 single-task jobs ids 378940-379889, afterok:375703_N each (indices 0-943); 8 CPU/16 GB/24 h, partitions ral+gpu; driver submit_vis_pix_rest_chain.sh +- `384040` — DR1 dr1_v2_new sep28 eclipse new_ab vis_lp (euclid_dr1_vis_lp_sep28_p01), 987 tiles (942 dr1_v2_new_cutouts_needed + 45 re-centred cut-outs; 48+21 dr1_sep1 duplicates excluded), v2 A 114 / B 873, v2_score 3.000->1.500, manifest hpc/run_manifests/vis_lp_sep28_20261001.txt, 4 CPU/12 GB/18 h, finder-2.1 positions (n_lt_2 279), --array=0-986%100, partition ral only; output/dr1_v2_new +- `384046` — DR1 dr1_v2_new sep28 vis_pix dependent singles (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_sep28_p01): 987 single-task jobs ids 384046-385042, each --array=N --dependency=afterok:384040_N --kill-on-invalid-dep=yes (indices 0-986); Numba sparse CPU, 8 CPU/16 GB/24 h, partition ral only; driver hpc/batch_cpu/submit_vis_pix_rest_chain.sh --batch=sep28 (idempotent, re-run to catch stragglers) +- `388367` — DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r01): 944 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_missing_20261003_rest_part01.txt, %40, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, partition ral only, script hpc/batch_cpu/submit_sersic_waveband_missing (skips complete tiles) +- `388368` — DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r02): 938 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_missing_20261003_rest_part02.txt, %40, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, partition ral only, script hpc/batch_cpu/submit_sersic_waveband_missing (skips complete tiles) +- `388369` — DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r03): 943 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_missing_20261003_rest_part03.txt, %40, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, partition ral only, script hpc/batch_cpu/submit_sersic_waveband_missing (skips complete tiles) +- `388370` — DR1 missing-SED sweep rest part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_r04): 939 dr1_sep1_rest tiles, vis_lp 375700-375703 done, no SED yet, manifest hpc/run_manifests/sed_missing_20261003_rest_part04.txt, %40, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, partition ral only, script hpc/batch_cpu/submit_sersic_waveband_missing (skips complete tiles) +- `388371` — DR1 missing-SED sweep dr1_v2_new (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_v2new): 303 sep28 tiles with completed vis_lp 384040 — first SED on non-DECam ground bands (HSC/MegaCam/PS1), manifest sed_missing_20261003_v2new.txt, %10, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, partition ral only, script hpc/batch_cpu/submit_sersic_waveband_missing (skips complete tiles) +- `388372` — DR1 missing-SED retry probe (euclid_dr1_sed_miss_retry): tasks 0-49 of 1,252 earlier SED TIMEOUT/FAILED/partial tiles, manifest sed_missing_20261003_retry.txt, %10; send 50-1251 only if the probe does not mostly hang, 8 CPU/16 GB/3 h, partition ral only, script hpc/batch_cpu/submit_sersic_waveband_missing (skips complete tiles) +- `398270` — DR1 dr1_sep1 ex-top1000 vis_pix chained on vis_lp 397467 (euclid_dr1_vis_pix_ex_top1000_p01): immediate array 398270 over 256 lenses whose vis_lp had completed (%60) + 741 single-task jobs 398271-399020 each afterok:397467_N --kill-on-invalid-dep=yes; manifest vis_lp_ex_top1000_tonight_20261007.txt, Numba sparse CPU 8 CPU/16 GB/24 h, partition ral only, --exclude=euclid-ral-compute-[1-4] (left for another user's 252-CPU whole-node jobs) and --nice=500 so it never outranks pending work; driver submit_vis_pix_rest_chain.sh --batch=ex_top1000 (idempotent, re-run to catch stragglers) +- `400282` — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p01): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move hung band aside, restart; band given up after 2 hangs via SED_SKIP_BANDS), manifest sed_fill_20261009/part01.txt (3,863 tiles over 4 parts: incomplete partial tiles fewest-missing-first, then none, then ex-top1000 with vis_lp; tiles still running in 397469/70/71/74 excluded), %25, 8 CPU/16 GB/6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100 +- `400308` — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p02): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move hung band aside, restart; band given up after 2 hangs via SED_SKIP_BANDS), manifest sed_fill_20261009/part02.txt (3,863 tiles over 4 parts: incomplete partial tiles fewest-missing-first, then none, then ex-top1000 with vis_lp; tiles still running in 397469/70/71/74 excluded), %25, 8 CPU/16 GB/6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100 +- `400309` — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p03): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move hung band aside, restart; band given up after 2 hangs via SED_SKIP_BANDS), manifest sed_fill_20261009/part03.txt (3,863 tiles over 4 parts: incomplete partial tiles fewest-missing-first, then none, then ex-top1000 with vis_lp; tiles still running in 397469/70/71/74 excluded), %25, 8 CPU/16 GB/6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100 +- `400310` — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 3 pass 1 part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_p04): submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261009 = 10-05 fill + 20-min stall watchdog (kill, move hung band aside, restart; band given up after 2 hangs via SED_SKIP_BANDS), manifest sed_fill_20261009/part04.txt (3,863 tiles over 4 parts: incomplete partial tiles fewest-missing-first, then none, then ex-top1000 with vis_lp; tiles still running in 397469/70/71/74 excluded), %25, 8 CPU/16 GB/6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100 +- `402719` — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p01): indices 697-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part01.txt, replacing 400282's cancelled pending tasks; submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 = 10-09 fill + VIS given up after two hangs (exit 3, logged to sed_fill_20261009/given_up_bands.txt) and tiles already given up for vis skipped; %25, 8 CPU/16 GB/6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100 +- `402720` — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p02): indices 527-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part02.txt, replacing 400308's cancelled pending tasks; submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 = 10-09 fill + VIS given up after two hangs (exit 3, logged to sed_fill_20261009/given_up_bands.txt) and tiles already given up for vis skipped; %25, 8 CPU/16 GB/6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100 +- `402721` — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p03): indices 363-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part03.txt, replacing 400309's cancelled pending tasks; submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 = 10-09 fill + VIS given up after two hangs (exit 3, logged to sed_fill_20261009/given_up_bands.txt) and tiles already given up for vis skipped; %25, 8 CPU/16 GB/6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100 +- `402722` — DR1 dr1_sep1 SED fill 4 pass 1 part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_p04): indices 803-862 of sed_fill_20261009/part04.txt, replacing 400310's cancelled pending tasks; submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 = 10-09 fill + VIS given up after two hangs (exit 3, logged to sed_fill_20261009/given_up_bands.txt) and tiles already given up for vis skipped; %25, 8 CPU/16 GB/6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100 +- `402909` — DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p01): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part01.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 (old, running tasks) and 402719-402722; complete tiles exit at once and tiles with vis given up are skipped, so it reruns only what is still incomplete; %25, 6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100 +- `402910` — DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p02): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part02.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 (old, running tasks) and 402719-402722; complete tiles exit at once and tiles with vis given up are skipped, so it reruns only what is still incomplete; %25, 6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100 +- `402911` — DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p03): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part03.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 (old, running tasks) and 402719-402722; complete tiles exit at once and tiles with vis given up are skipped, so it reruns only what is still incomplete; %25, 6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100 +- `402912` — DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p04): indices 0-862 of sed_fill_20261009/part04.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 (old, running tasks) and 402719-402722; complete tiles exit at once and tiles with vis given up are skipped, so it reruns only what is still incomplete; %25, 6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100 + +
    + +
    Recent log — 5 of 136 entries + +- 2026-10-10 — *run* — 402912 submitted: DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p04): indices 0-862 of sed_fill_20261009/part04.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 (old, running tasks) and 402719-402722; complete tiles exit at once and tiles with vis given up are skipped, so it reruns only what is still incomplete; %25, 6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100 +- 2026-10-10 — *run* — 402911 submitted: DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 03/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p03): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part03.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 (old, running tasks) and 402719-402722; complete tiles exit at once and tiles with vis given up are skipped, so it reruns only what is still incomplete; %25, 6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100 +- 2026-10-10 — *run* — 402910 submitted: DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 02/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p02): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part02.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 (old, running tasks) and 402719-402722; complete tiles exit at once and tiles with vis given up are skipped, so it reruns only what is still incomplete; %25, 6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100 +- 2026-10-10 — *run* — 402909 submitted: DR1 SED fill 4 pass 2 (retry) part 01/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill4_retry_p01): indices 0-999 of sed_fill_20261009/part01.txt; same script submit_sersic_waveband_sed_fill_20261010 and manifest; afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 (old, running tasks) and 402719-402722; complete tiles exit at once and tiles with vis given up are skipped, so it reruns only what is still incomplete; %25, 6 h, partition ral only, --nice=100 +- 2026-10-10 — *run* — 400314 failed: DR1 SED fill 3 pass 2 (retry) part 04/4 (euclid_dr1_sed_fill3_retry_p04): same script and manifest part04.txt, afterany on pass 1 400282/400308/400309/400310 and the old fill 397469/70/71/74; complete tiles exit at once, so it reruns only what is still incomplete; %25, 6 h, partition ral only + +[full log](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/euclid_dr1.md) -active · ral · [PyAutoCortex#34](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/issues/34) · [projects/analytic_gaussian.md](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/analytic_gaussian.md) · local `/mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/analytic_gaussian` · RAL `/mnt/ral/jnightin/active/analytic_gaussian` +active · ral · no issue yet + +
    + +
    -**Now** +
    analytic_gaussian — Graphical and EP against a closed-form Gaussian posterior, at ensemble scale · no runs recorded · updated 2026-10-14 + +**Registered:** not recorded + +**Local:** `` /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/analytic_gaussian `` + +**RAL:** `` /mnt/ral/jnightin/active/analytic_gaussian `` + +**Current position** Wave 1 (342413, 200 seeds at N=5) is accepted as the baseline: autofit EP is exact on the Gaussian leg, leg B sigma misses as pre-registered (78/200), collapse rate 0/200. On criterion 2, astra and an independent Opus review both favour an under-calibrated mu threshold (calibrated on five unrepresentative seeds) and found no defect in the minimal-EP control; both flag the per-site sigma>0 clip (analytic_ep_minimal.py:333) as the one audit target, and astra will not clear the control without an independent reconstruction of the EP fixed point. Next: run the planned diagnostic (archive/tasks/analytic_gaussian/minimal_ep_legb_mu_threshold.md) on a passing, an edge and the worst mu seed; the N=25 rung stays written but unsubmitted until it lands. -**Runs** +
    📋 + +``` +Use the cortex skill. — resume analytic_gaussian: read PyAutoCortex projects/analytic_gaussian.md (Now, Runs, Log) and then /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/analytic_gaussian/wiki/project/state.md and the assistant autofit_assistant's AGENTS.md; tell me where I left off and what I said I would do next. Submit nothing and log nothing until I say. +``` + +
    + +**Runs** (0) -- _nothing on the cluster_ +_nothing on the cluster_ -**Last 5** +
    Recent log — 5 of 7 entries -- 2026-10-14 — *note* — PyAutoFit#1656 (merged 2026-09-30, released 2026.10.7.1) ports the minimal-EP referee's moment matching as LaplaceOptimiser(projection="moments"); on analytic_gaussian.py leg B autofit EP sigma 6.3401 ± 2.4609 vs closed form 6.5667 ± 2.883… +- 2026-10-14 — *note* — PyAutoFit#1656 (merged 2026-09-30, released 2026.10.7.1) ports the minimal-EP referee's moment matching as LaplaceOptimiser(projection="moments"); on analytic_gaussian.py leg B autofit EP sigma 6.3401 ± 2.4609 vs closed form 6.5667 ± 2.8832 (mode path 9.3722, BAD_PROJECTION=19). A wave-2 ensemble on the moments path needs a private PyAutoFit checkout on RAL: the shared mirror is 404b3e5f7 and lacks it. The criterion-2 mu-threshold diagnostic is still unrun. - 2026-10-14 — *note* — output/ vaulted to z_vault/ on laptop and RAL (mv, nothing deleted), anticipating reruns; output/ left empty, results/ untouched; z_vault/ gitignored locally -- 2026-09-30 — *note* — astra (Codex gpt-6-astra) on criterion 2, verbatim: 'Neither is established as "wrong" by this result alone. I favour inadequate calibration of the threshold, with moderate confidence, but would not yet certify the control.' Decisive diagn… +- 2026-09-30 — *note* — astra (Codex gpt-6-astra) on criterion 2, verbatim: 'Neither is established as "wrong" by this result alone. I favour inadequate calibration of the threshold, with moderate confidence, but would not yet certify the control.' Decisive diagnostic: independently reconstruct the same EP factorisation at the fixed point on a passing, an edge and the worst mu seed and compare tilted vs q moments; audit the per-site sigma>0 clip (analytic_ep_minimal.py:333). Opus reviewer concurs independently (a_mu = 0.041*(E_ref[mu]-m0)/std_ref over 200 seeds, corr 0.98; calibration seeds 0-4 had |a_mu| 0.002-0.020 vs 95th pct 0.077). Full answer: PyAutoCortex#50 comment https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/issues/50#issuecomment-5908448194 - 2026-09-10 — *result* — accepted ensemble_parity (R-20260910-04): ok accept and intake the things to address. we can do another run down the line so also achieve the results in the analytic_gaussian project for future comparison - 2026-09-10 — *note* — question: Is criterion 2's mu threshold or the minimal-EP control wrong — planned, never run [archive/tasks/analytic_gaussian/minimal_ep_legb_mu_threshold.md] [full log](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/analytic_gaussian.md) -
    📋 resume analytic_gaussian +active · ral · [PyAutoCortex#34](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/issues/34) -``` -Use the cortex skill. — resume analytic_gaussian: read PyAutoCortex projects/analytic_gaussian.md (Now, Runs, Log) and then /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/analytic_gaussian/wiki/project/state.md and the assistant autofit_assistant's AGENTS.md; tell me where I left off and what I said I would do next. Submit nothing and log nothing until I say. -``` +
    -### ep_toy_gaussian — NUTS versus three EP fits on the #1405 collapse toy at N=50 +
    ep_toy_gaussian — NUTS versus three EP fits on the #1405 collapse toy at N=50 · no runs recorded · updated 2026-10-14 + +**Registered:** not recorded + +**Local:** `` /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/ep_toy_gaussian `` -active · ral · [ep_toy_gaussian#1](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/ep_toy_gaussian/issues/1) · [projects/ep_toy_gaussian.md](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/ep_toy_gaussian.md) · local `/mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/ep_toy_gaussian` · RAL `/mnt/ral/jnightin/active/ep_toy_gaussian` +**RAL:** `` /mnt/ral/jnightin/active/ep_toy_gaussian `` -**Now** +**Current position** Wave 1 (n50_seed42: 342639 + 342640_[0-2]) failed on infrastructure — EP x3 on EMFILE (fixed by PyAutoFit#1632/#1634, both in the RAL mirror at 404b3e5f7), NUTS on OOM at the 8 GB cap while XLA compiled the 50-factor window-adaptation scan, which grows with N (≥5.4 GB at N=20 locally). Wave 2 is prepared but not submitted: sample n50_seed42_w2 (free locally and on RAL; still needs its toy.SAMPLES entry), submit_nuts raised to 64 GB, submit_ep unchanged at 8 GB (peak ~590 MB). The collapse question at N=50 is unanswered; only n5_smoke speaks (EP RECOVER 3/3, NUTS 49.89/11.14). Next: human go, add the sample entry, push and submit NUTS then EP with SAMPLE=n50_seed42_w2 exported. -**Runs** +
    📋 -- _nothing on the cluster_ +``` +Use the cortex skill. — resume ep_toy_gaussian: read PyAutoCortex projects/ep_toy_gaussian.md (Now, Runs, Log) and then /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/ep_toy_gaussian/wiki/project/state.md and the assistant autofit_assistant's AGENTS.md; tell me where I left off and what I said I would do next. Submit nothing and log nothing until I say. +``` + +
    + +**Runs** (0) -**Last 5** +_nothing on the cluster_ + +
    Recent log — 5 of 10 entries - 2026-10-14 — *note* — Wave 2 still unsubmitted. RAL shared mirror 404b3e5f7 already carries the EMFILE fixes (#1632/#1634) wave 2 needs; it lacks #1655 (ProjectionException recovery), so a private PyAutoFit checkout is optional here but advisable. - 2026-10-14 — *note* — output/ vaulted to z_vault/ on laptop and RAL (mv, nothing deleted), anticipating reruns; output/ left empty, results/ untouched; z_vault/ gitignored locally -- 2026-09-30 — *note* — RAL mirror PyAutoFit now 404b3e5f7 (2026-09-27), contains #1632 (b82fb3f69) and #1634 (fa2d540ac); 5 commits behind origin/main, none in blackjax/graphical/dynesty; deps at floor except anesthetic 2.8.14 < 2.9.0 (plots only). Sample n50_se… -- 2026-09-30 — *note* — wave-2 prep: 342639 NUTS OOM was XLA compilation of the vmapped window-adaptation scan, not sampling (sacct MaxRSS 8,180,536K at ReqMem 8G; py-spy on a local N=50 run sits in backend_compile_and_load; local probes N=10 3.2 GB peak / 132 s… -- 2026-09-24 — *note* — per-search overhead profile on this toy (2026-09-24, laptop, N=5, max_steps=3): 2.45 s per Dynesty factor search, ~1.47 s dynesty run_nested + ~0.98 s autofit wrapper (plots, a redundant second run_nested pass, samples writes); inside run_… +- 2026-09-30 — *note* — RAL mirror PyAutoFit now 404b3e5f7 (2026-09-27), contains #1632 (b82fb3f69) and #1634 (fa2d540ac); 5 commits behind origin/main, none in blackjax/graphical/dynesty; deps at floor except anesthetic 2.8.14 < 2.9.0 (plots only). Sample n50_seed42_w2 is free locally and on RAL but must be added to toy.SAMPLES (scripts/toy.py) before submission, and SAMPLE must be exported to the job (hpc/sync submit does not forward laptop env) +- 2026-09-30 — *note* — wave-2 prep: 342639 NUTS OOM was XLA compilation of the vmapped window-adaptation scan, not sampling (sacct MaxRSS 8,180,536K at ReqMem 8G; py-spy on a local N=50 run sits in backend_compile_and_load; local probes N=10 3.2 GB peak / 132 s warmup compile, N=20 >=5.4 GB / 247 s, N=50 still compiling at 5 min) — submit_nuts --mem raised 8gb -> 64gb locally, uncommitted (est. peak 15-25 GB on RAL; ral nodes ~921 GB); EP peak ~590 MB, submit_ep stays 8gb +- 2026-09-24 — *note* — per-search overhead profile on this toy (2026-09-24, laptop, N=5, max_steps=3): 2.45 s per Dynesty factor search, ~1.47 s dynesty run_nested + ~0.98 s autofit wrapper (plots, a redundant second run_nested pass, samples writes); inside run_nested instance_from_vector is 57 % of the likelihood callback for a 1-parameter model. Speed-up prompt filed in the Mind: draft/refactor/autofit/ep_factor_search_wrapper_overhead.md [full log](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/ep_toy_gaussian.md) -
    📋 resume ep_toy_gaussian +active · ral · [ep_toy_gaussian#1](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/ep_toy_gaussian/issues/1) -``` -Use the cortex skill. — resume ep_toy_gaussian: read PyAutoCortex projects/ep_toy_gaussian.md (Now, Runs, Log) and then /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/ep_toy_gaussian/wiki/project/state.md and the assistant autofit_assistant's AGENTS.md; tell me where I left off and what I said I would do next. Submit nothing and log nothing until I say. -``` +
    -### slope_hierarchy_scale — Hierarchical slope recovery with graphical and EP at N=25 to 50 +
    slope_hierarchy_scale — Hierarchical slope recovery with graphical and EP at N=25 to 50 · no runs recorded · updated 2026-10-14 + +**Registered:** not recorded + +**Local:** `` /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/slope_hierarchy_scale `` -active · both · [slope_hierarchy_scale#2](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/slope_hierarchy_scale/issues/2) · [projects/slope_hierarchy_scale.md](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/slope_hierarchy_scale.md) · local `/mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/slope_hierarchy_scale` · RAL `/mnt/ral/jnightin/active/slope_hierarchy_scale` +**RAL:** `` /mnt/ral/jnightin/active/slope_hierarchy_scale `` -**Now** +**Current position** The N=25 graphical baselines are in: per-lens fits (342348) give a naive parent of 1.999 / 0.089 (deconvolved 0.085), and the joint NUTS fit (342350_0) recovers mean 1.994 [1.976, 2.014] and sigma 0.087 [0.074, 0.104] against truth 2.0 / 0.1; its summary JSON still needs writing offline from samples.csv (now under z_vault/sample_n25_seed42). The EP arm returned the prior on the Laplace projection (343299: hierarchical factor 0/50 SUCCESS). The cure has landed: PyAutoFit#1656 (merged 2026-09-30, released 2026.10.7.1) adds af.LaplaceOptimiser(projection="moments"), which takes the tight toy from 0 to 3/3 SUCCESS. The shared RAL PyAutoFit mirror is still 404b3e5f7 (2026-09-27, kept frozen for euclid_dr1) and lacks both #1655 and #1656, so any rerun needs a private PyAutoFit checkout on RAL. All earlier output is vaulted in z_vault/ on laptop and RAL, output/ is empty for the rerun. Next: rerun the N=25 EP arm with projection="moments" on a private PyAutoFit checkout and compare its scatter against the NUTS baseline. -**Runs** +
    📋 -- _nothing on the cluster_ +``` +Use the cortex skill. — resume slope_hierarchy_scale: read PyAutoCortex projects/slope_hierarchy_scale.md (Now, Runs, Log) and then /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/slope_hierarchy_scale/wiki/project/state.md and the assistant autolens_assistant's AGENTS.md; tell me where I left off and what I said I would do next. Submit nothing and log nothing until I say. +``` -**Last 5** +
    + +**Runs** (0) + +_nothing on the cluster_ + +
    Recent log — 5 of 14 entries - 2026-10-14 — *note* — output/ vaulted to z_vault/ on laptop and RAL (mv, nothing deleted), anticipating reruns; output/ left empty, results/ untouched; z_vault/ gitignored locally -- 2026-09-30 — *note* — graphical baselines recorded late at the 2026-09-30 check-in. 342348_[0-24] per-lens (one_by_one Nautilus, A100, 25/25, 6.9-8.8 min/task, 0 float32 truncations): naive parent mean 1.9992 +/- 0.0178 (SEM), std of medians 0.0889, deconvolved… -- 2026-09-30 — *run* — 342351_0 failed — wall 27:41: n25_scale_up: EP arm on the CPU partition, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_ep, max_steps 12; RAL PyAutoFit mirror 68ff9bd57 predates PyAutoFit#1580, so this arm runs without the stale-mask fixed-point fix — CANCELLED 202… -- 2026-09-30 — *run* — 342350_0 failed — wall 16:29: n25_scale_up: joint hierarchical NUTS fit, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_graphical — OUT_OF_MEMORY 2026-09-09 13:06:31 BST (sacct 0:125, cgroup oom-kill): NUTS warm-up 500 + sampling 1000 steps completed and samples.cs… -- 2026-09-30 — *run* — 342348_[0-24] finished — wall 3:22: n25_scale_up: one lens per array task, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_one_by_one, sample_n25_seed42 — all 25 tasks COMPLETED 2026-09-08 17:14-20:37 BST (sacct, 6:54-8:50 per task, serial on the GPU): per-lens one_… +- 2026-09-30 — *note* — graphical baselines recorded late at the 2026-09-30 check-in. 342348_[0-24] per-lens (one_by_one Nautilus, A100, 25/25, 6.9-8.8 min/task, 0 float32 truncations): naive parent mean 1.9992 +/- 0.0178 (SEM), std of medians 0.0889, deconvolved scatter 0.0852 (rms 1-sigma half-width 0.0255); truth inside the 1-sigma interval for 17/25 lenses; per-lens JSONs on RAL at results/one_by_one_sample_n25_seed42/dataset_*.json (not pulled; aggregate never written by the array). 342350_0 joint hierarchical NUTS: science completed despite the post-processing OOM — 500 warm-up (8h08m) + 1000 samples (7h17m), 1 chain, 0 divergences, acceptance 0.84, rhat_max 1.012, ess_min 133/302 params; parent mean 1.9936 [1.9761, 2.0136] 68%, sigma 0.0871 [0.0744, 0.1041] 68% (95% [0.0636, 0.1190]) vs truth 2.0/0.1 and realised draws 1.9917/0.0864 — the N=5 high-scatter bias (0.143) is gone at N=25. Computed from RAL samples.csv (graphical_nuts/f16c32e17f570603a1dc061f95792798/files); results/graphical_nuts_sample_n25_seed42.json never written (killed at 64 GB in latent/arviz post-processing) — pull samples.csv and write the summary offline +- 2026-09-30 — *run* — 342351_0 failed — wall 27:41: n25_scale_up: EP arm on the CPU partition, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_ep, max_steps 12; RAL PyAutoFit mirror 68ff9bd57 predates PyAutoFit#1580, so this arm runs without the stale-mask fixed-point fix — CANCELLED 2026-09-09 20:56:19 BST (sacct 1-03:41:06): log stops at the first Nautilus status line 2026-09-08 17:15:36, no factor finished; superseded by 342410 then 343299, output parked as ep_dead_342351; recorded late at the 2026-09-30 check-in +- 2026-09-30 — *run* — 342350_0 failed — wall 16:29: n25_scale_up: joint hierarchical NUTS fit, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_graphical — OUT_OF_MEMORY 2026-09-09 13:06:31 BST (sacct 0:125, cgroup oom-kill): NUTS warm-up 500 + sampling 1000 steps completed and samples.csv was written 12:14 (output/sample_n25_seed42/graphical/graphical_nuts/f16c32e17f570603a1dc061f95792798/files/samples.csv), then killed during latent samples / arviz post-processing; recorded late at the 2026-09-30 check-in +- 2026-09-30 — *run* — 342348_[0-24] finished — wall 3:22: n25_scale_up: one lens per array task, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_one_by_one, sample_n25_seed42 — all 25 tasks COMPLETED 2026-09-08 17:14-20:37 BST (sacct, 6:54-8:50 per task, serial on the GPU): per-lens one_by_one slopes are the baseline, e.g. dataset_0 2.0417 [2.0130, 2.0730] (truth 2.0305), dataset_24 2.0333 [2.0205, 2.0463] (truth 2.0439); recorded late at the 2026-09-30 check-in [full log](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/slope_hierarchy_scale.md) -
    📋 resume slope_hierarchy_scale +active · both · [slope_hierarchy_scale#2](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/slope_hierarchy_scale/issues/2) -``` -Use the cortex skill. — resume slope_hierarchy_scale: read PyAutoCortex projects/slope_hierarchy_scale.md (Now, Runs, Log) and then /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/slope_hierarchy_scale/wiki/project/state.md and the assistant autolens_assistant's AGENTS.md; tell me where I left off and what I said I would do next. Submit nothing and log nothing until I say. -``` +
    -### ic50_workspace — EP against the graphical joint fit on IC50 dose-response data, scaling up +
    ic50_workspace — EP against the graphical joint fit on IC50 dose-response data, scaling up · no runs recorded · updated 2026-10-14 + +**Registered:** not recorded -active · ral · [PyAutoCortex#36](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/issues/36) · [projects/ic50_workspace.md](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/ic50_workspace.md) · local `/mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/ic50_workspace` · RAL `/mnt/ral/jnightin/active/ic50_workspace` +**Local:** `` /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/ic50_workspace `` -**Now** +**RAL:** `` /mnt/ral/jnightin/active/ic50_workspace `` + +**Current position** The scale ladder is in. EP passes N=5/10/25 with coef_mean within 3σ and cost growing about linearly per sweep (26/50/140 s); it died at N=50 on a projection assert. That fix has landed: PyAutoFit#1655 (merged 2026-09-30, released 2026.10.7.1) raises ProjectionException, which EP factor_step now recovers from instead of killing the run. Graphical is cheaper but overconfident beyond N=25, and EP hill_coef widths are not yet comparable because util.py reports factor-message widths. The shared RAL PyAutoFit mirror is still 404b3e5f7 (2026-09-27, kept frozen for euclid_dr1) and lacks both #1655 and #1656, so any rerun needs a private PyAutoFit checkout on RAL. All earlier output is vaulted in z_vault/ on laptop and RAL, output/ is empty for the rerun. Next: rerun the EP ladder on a private PyAutoFit checkout with output on and a fixed seed, report hill_coef from the mean field, then give ep_lbfgs_jax a witness as the scale lever. -**Runs** +
    📋 -- _nothing on the cluster_ +``` +Use the cortex skill. — resume ic50_workspace: read PyAutoCortex projects/ic50_workspace.md (Now, Runs, Log) and then /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/ic50_workspace/NOTES.md; tell me where I left off and what I said I would do next. Submit nothing and log nothing until I say. +``` -**Last 5** +
    + +**Runs** (0) + +_nothing on the cluster_ + +
    Recent log — 5 of 12 entries - 2026-10-14 — *note* — output/ vaulted to z_vault/ on laptop and RAL (mv, nothing deleted), anticipating reruns; output/ left empty, results/ untouched; z_vault/ gitignored locally -- 2026-09-30 — *note* — Ladder read: EP s/sweep 26/50/140/~300 s at N=5/10/25/50 vs graphical wall 21/42/119/281 s. EP hill_coef widths flat at ~0.8 because util.py reports factor-message (likelihood) widths and the global factor freezes hill_coef; graphical widt… -- 2026-09-30 — *note* — 342411 N=50 failure diagnosed: AssertionError at autofit/messages/abstract.py:316 while projecting the global factor after EP sweep 4 (mirror 66f9f8d5d); the 4th global search had max logL -337 (vs -69 at sweep 3) and logz +/- nan. Library… -- 2026-09-09 — *run* — 342411 failed — wall 0:38: ep_scale_up: EP scale ladder, sim rungs 5/10/25/50, nlive 150 max_steps 12 — finished 2026-09-09 23:19:29 BST (sacct COMPLETED 00:38:49, the ladder catches rung failures): rungs N=5/10/25 passed the global coef_m… -- 2026-09-09 — *run* — 342412 finished — wall 0:07: ep_scale_up: graphical scale ladder, sim rungs 5/10/25/50, nlive 150 — COMPLETED 2026-09-09 22:48:42 BST (sacct 00:07:59): all four rungs N=5/10/25/50 passed the global coef_mean assertions (within 3σ); results… +- 2026-09-30 — *note* — Ladder read: EP s/sweep 26/50/140/~300 s at N=5/10/25/50 vs graphical wall 21/42/119/281 s. EP hill_coef widths flat at ~0.8 because util.py reports factor-message (likelihood) widths and the global factor freezes hill_coef; graphical widths shrink but fall to 56/75 and 65/150 within 3 sigma at N=25/50 (overconfident). coef_mean passes 3 sigma for both methods on every completed rung. +- 2026-09-30 — *note* — 342411 N=50 failure diagnosed: AssertionError at autofit/messages/abstract.py:316 while projecting the global factor after EP sweep 4 (mirror 66f9f8d5d); the 4th global search had max logL -337 (vs -69 at sweep 3) and logz +/- nan. Library defect: project asserts on non-finite suff_stats and factor_step (optimiser.py:150) does not catch AssertionError, so one bad projection kills the run; no later commit touches the path. A local rerun at 66f9f8d5d converged in sweep 3 without failing (unseeded Dynesty, non-deterministic). Mind bug prompt draft/bug/autofit/ep_project_nonfinite_suff_stats_ic50_n50.md +- 2026-09-09 — *run* — 342411 failed — wall 0:38: ep_scale_up: EP scale ladder, sim rungs 5/10/25/50, nlive 150 max_steps 12 — finished 2026-09-09 23:19:29 BST (sacct COMPLETED 00:38:49, the ladder catches rung failures): rungs N=5/10/25 passed the global coef_mean assertions; rung N=50 FAILED — AssertionError: assert np.isfinite(suff_stats).all() in autofit/messages/abstract.py:316 project (via mapper/prior/abstract.py:237), error.342411.err +- 2026-09-09 — *run* — 342412 finished — wall 0:07: ep_scale_up: graphical scale ladder, sim rungs 5/10/25/50, nlive 150 — COMPLETED 2026-09-09 22:48:42 BST (sacct 00:07:59): all four rungs N=5/10/25/50 passed the global coef_mean assertions (within 3σ); results/graphical_ladder_n*_summary.json [full log](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/ic50_workspace.md) -
    📋 resume ic50_workspace +active · ral · [PyAutoCortex#36](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/issues/36) -``` -Use the cortex skill. — resume ic50_workspace: read PyAutoCortex projects/ic50_workspace.md (Now, Runs, Log) and then /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/ic50_workspace/NOTES.md; tell me where I left off and what I said I would do next. Submit nothing and log nothing until I say. -``` +
    -### autolens_inference — Do the PyAutoLens inference backends agree on the HST SLaM posterior +
    autolens_inference — Do the PyAutoLens inference backends agree on the HST SLaM posterior · 6 running · 0 open · updated 2026-09-24 + +**Registered:** not recorded -active · both · [autolens_inference#4](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/autolens_inference/issues/4) · [projects/autolens_inference.md](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/autolens_inference.md) · local `/home/jammy/Code/PyAutoLabs/lens/autolens_inference` · RAL `/mnt/ral/jnightin/inference/autolens_inference` +**Local:** `` /home/jammy/Code/PyAutoLabs/lens/autolens_inference `` -**Now** +**RAL:** `` /mnt/ral/jnightin/inference/autolens_inference `` + +**Current position** All pre-likelihood-speedup SLaM HST rows (slam_base A100 dense/sparse, the 342695 rate probe, delaunay_1250 A100 dense/sparse 343143/343145) are archived under results|output/archive/2026-09-24_pre_likelihood_speedup/ (autolens_inference#12). Running since 2026-09-24 on today's library mains: slam_base A100 dense 350674 / sparse 350675, delaunay_1250 A100 dense 350678 / sparse 350679, and the first CPU leg, slam_base numba_cpu sparse 350682 on ral; seeds 0-1 each. Next: pull the rows, commit them live, and read the new-vs-archived per-stage walls as the inference-level speedup; then the fixed-lens-light variant resumes from these output trees. -**Runs** +
    📋 + +``` +Use the cortex skill. — resume autolens_inference: read PyAutoCortex projects/autolens_inference.md (Now, Runs, Log) and then /home/jammy/Code/PyAutoLabs/lens/autolens_inference/wiki/project/state.md and the assistant autolens_assistant's AGENTS.md; tell me where I left off and what I said I would do next. Submit nothing and log nothing until I say. +``` + +
    -- 350674_[0-1] — running — gpu — 2026-09-24 — slam_hst_base: A100 leg, dense inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_hst_jax_gpu_dense (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_dense_fp64, variant slam_base) — re-r… -- 350675_[0-1] — running — gpu — 2026-09-24 — slam_hst_base: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64, variant slam_base) — r… -- 350678_[0-1] — running — gpu — 2026-09-24 — slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, dense inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_dense (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_dense_fp64, var… -- 350679_[0-1] — running — gpu — 2026-09-24 — slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64,… -- 350682_[0-1] — running — ral — 2026-09-24 — slam_hst_base: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, 8 cpus, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_sparse_fp64, varia… -- 350684_[0-1] — running — ral — 2026-09-24 — slam_hst_delaunay_1250: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_spar… +**Runs** (6) -**Last 5** +| Job | State | Partition | Date | Description | +|---|---|---|---|---| +| `350674_[0-1]` | running | gpu | 2026-09-24 | slam_hst_base: A100 leg, dense inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_hst_jax_gpu_dense (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_dense_fp64, variant slam_base) — re-r… | +| `350675_[0-1]` | running | gpu | 2026-09-24 | slam_hst_base: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64, variant slam_base) — r… | +| `350678_[0-1]` | running | gpu | 2026-09-24 | slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, dense inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_dense (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_dense_fp64, var… | +| `350679_[0-1]` | running | gpu | 2026-09-24 | slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64,… | +| `350682_[0-1]` | running | ral | 2026-09-24 | slam_hst_base: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, 8 cpus, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_sparse_fp64, varia… | +| `350684_[0-1]` | running | ral | 2026-09-24 | slam_hst_delaunay_1250: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_spar… | -- 2026-09-24 — *run* — 350684_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_delaunay_1250: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_sparse_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) on the post-speedup libr… -- 2026-09-24 — *run* — 350682_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_base: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, 8 cpus, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_sparse_fp64, variant slam_base), 5-day containment — first CPU leg of the… -- 2026-09-24 — *run* — 350679_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) — re-run on the post-speedup libr… -- 2026-09-24 — *run* — 350678_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, dense inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_dense (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_dense_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) — re-run on the post-speedup library… -- 2026-09-24 — *run* — 350675_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_base: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64, variant slam_base) — re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5,… +
    Full descriptions (6 shortened above) + +- `350674_[0-1]` — slam_hst_base: A100 leg, dense inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_hst_jax_gpu_dense (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_dense_fp64, variant slam_base) — re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5, Lens 86054bbc1, Fit dd9fbe0aa, Galaxy 70a61e26, Nerves 1fa613a); old tree archived so nothing resumes; kept at the normal path for the fixed-lens-light resume variant +- `350675_[0-1]` — slam_hst_base: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64, variant slam_base) — re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5, Lens 86054bbc1, Fit dd9fbe0aa, Galaxy 70a61e26, Nerves 1fa613a); old tree archived so nothing resumes; kept at the normal path for the fixed-lens-light resume variant +- `350678_[0-1]` — slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, dense inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_dense (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_dense_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) — re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5, Lens 86054bbc1, Fit dd9fbe0aa, Galaxy 70a61e26, Nerves 1fa613a); old tree archived so nothing resumes; kept at the normal path for the fixed-lens-light resume variant +- `350679_[0-1]` — slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) — re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5, Lens 86054bbc1, Fit dd9fbe0aa, Galaxy 70a61e26, Nerves 1fa613a); old tree archived so nothing resumes; kept at the normal path for the fixed-lens-light resume variant +- `350682_[0-1]` — slam_hst_base: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, 8 cpus, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_sparse_fp64, variant slam_base), 5-day containment — first CPU leg of the parity row; re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5, Lens 86054bbc1, Fit dd9fbe0aa, Galaxy 70a61e26, Nerves 1fa613a); old tree archived so nothing resumes; kept at the normal path for the fixed-lens-light resume variant +- `350684_[0-1]` — slam_hst_delaunay_1250: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_sparse_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) on the post-speedup library mains; euclid test-mode witness passed 2026-09-24 + +
    + +
    Recent log — 5 of 16 entries + +- 2026-09-24 — *run* — 350684_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_delaunay_1250: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_sparse_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) on the post-speedup library mains; euclid test-mode witness passed 2026-09-24 +- 2026-09-24 — *run* — 350682_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_base: numba_cpu leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, 8 cpus, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_slam_hst_numba_cpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_numba_cpu_sparse_fp64, variant slam_base), 5-day containment — first CPU leg of the parity row; re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5, Lens 86054bbc1, Fit dd9fbe0aa, Galaxy 70a61e26, Nerves 1fa613a); old tree archived so nothing resumes; kept at the normal path for the fixed-lens-light resume variant +- 2026-09-24 — *run* — 350679_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) — re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5, Lens 86054bbc1, Fit dd9fbe0aa, Galaxy 70a61e26, Nerves 1fa613a); old tree archived so nothing resumes; kept at the normal path for the fixed-lens-light resume variant +- 2026-09-24 — *run* — 350678_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_delaunay_1250: A100 leg, dense inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_delaunay1250_hst_jax_gpu_dense (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_dense_fp64, variant delaunay_1250) — re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5, Lens 86054bbc1, Fit dd9fbe0aa, Galaxy 70a61e26, Nerves 1fa613a); old tree archived so nothing resumes; kept at the normal path for the fixed-lens-light resume variant +- 2026-09-24 — *run* — 350675_[0-1] submitted: slam_hst_base: A100 leg, sparse inversion, seeds 0-1, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_slam_hst_jax_gpu_sparse (config hpc_a100_jax_gpu_sparse_fp64, variant slam_base) — re-run on the post-speedup library mains (Array 3de624b5, Lens 86054bbc1, Fit dd9fbe0aa, Galaxy 70a61e26, Nerves 1fa613a); old tree archived so nothing resumes; kept at the normal path for the fixed-lens-light resume variant [full log](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/autolens_inference.md) -
    📋 resume autolens_inference +active · both · [autolens_inference#4](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/autolens_inference/issues/4) + +
    + +
    + +
    autofit_inference — PyAutoFit search benchmark on gaussian_x3: which searches find the right answer fastest · 0 running · 1 open · updated 2026-10-15 + +**Registered:** 2026-10-08 + +**Local:** `` /home/jammy/Code/PyAutoLabs/fit/autofit_inference `` + +**RAL:** `` /mnt/ral/jnightin/inference/autofit_inference `` + +**Current position** + +B5c (2026-10-15, autofit_inference#14): a second model family, correlated_nd (correlated Gaussians D = 20/50/100, condition number 10^3, and a D = 20 hybrid Rosenbrock banana, exact posteriors and ln Z), pre-registered as correlated_nd@1 (first committed 9ec37795f404; amendment A1 before any row) with seeded datasets and eight exact references that pass the section 6 agreement test. Its 930-run pilot is RAL 409957 on --partition=ral at the pin df6d218f10cd; it ranks nothing and is catalogued apart from gaussian_x3 (nothing ranked across families). gaussian_x3 wave 2 stays closed and judged under gaussian_x3@2. Next: B5c-2 pulls the pilot (results/ only), judges it under @1, freezes correlated_nd@2 and submits the scored wave. + +
    📋 ``` -Use the cortex skill. — resume autolens_inference: read PyAutoCortex projects/autolens_inference.md (Now, Runs, Log) and then /home/jammy/Code/PyAutoLabs/lens/autolens_inference/wiki/project/state.md and the assistant autolens_assistant's AGENTS.md; tell me where I left off and what I said I would do next. Submit nothing and log nothing until I say. +Use the cortex skill. — resume autofit_inference: read PyAutoCortex projects/autofit_inference.md (Now, Runs, Log) and then /home/jammy/Code/PyAutoLabs/fit/autofit_inference/wiki/project/state.md and the assistant autofit_assistant's AGENTS.md; tell me where I left off and what I said I would do next. Submit nothing and log nothing until I say. ```
    -### autofit_inference — PyAutoFit search benchmark on gaussian_x3: which searches find the right answer fastest - -active · ral · [autofit_inference#8](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/autofit_inference/issues/8) · [projects/autofit_inference.md](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/autofit_inference.md) · local `/home/jammy/Code/PyAutoLabs/fit/autofit_inference` · RAL `/mnt/ral/jnightin/inference/autofit_inference` +**Runs** (1) -**Now** +| Job | State | Partition | Date | Description | +|---|---|---|---|---| +| `409957_[0-929]` | open | ral | 2026-10-15 | correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family; protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cel… | -Wave 2 closed and judged under gaussian_x3@2 (B5b-2, 2026-10-15): all 12,750 pulled rows admitted at PyAutoFit pin df6d218f10cd; of the 13,000 expected runs, 11,580 rows + 1,170 failed + 0 missing + 250 deferred. The 409930 probe-first legs close: NSS 50-step leads both evidence rankings (blend 158/250, separated 210/250); Zeus JAX is 0/250 on the blend and 190/250 on the separated control (first among separated posterior legs). The catalogue ranks only legs with success rate >= 50 % over >= 20 attempts and lists the rest as unreliable (post-hoc presentation convention, protocol §8 note; autofit_inference#12 ruling 2). Summary records published as inference-summary@3 (101 record shards). Next: after the B5b-2 PRs merge, capture the Insight fit snapshot from main under @3 and run pyauto-insight check online; then B5c (a second model family). +
    Full descriptions (1 shortened above) -**Runs** +- `409957_[0-929]` — correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family; protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells over corr_gaussian_d20/d50/d100 + rosenbrock_d20, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100; submit_correlated_nd_pilot; pin df6d218f10cd; pulled in B5c-2 -- _nothing on the cluster_ +
    -**Last 5** +
    Recent log — 5 of 24 entries -- 2026-10-15 — *run* — 409930_[0-19] finished — wall 1:30: wave-2 probe-first remainder (B5b): Zeus JAX + NSS n_live_200_mcmc_steps_50, both datasets, 980 runs after the probe under probe-derived @2 timeouts (NSS 600 s, Zeus 1168 s); %20; submit_wave2_remainder;… +- 2026-10-15 — *run* — 409957_[0-929] submitted: correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family; protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells over corr_gaussian_d20/d50/d100 + rosenbrock_d20, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100; submit_correlated_nd_pilot; pin df6d218f10cd; pulled in B5c-2 +- 2026-10-15 — *run* — 409930_[0-19] finished — wall 1:30: wave-2 probe-first remainder (B5b): Zeus JAX + NSS n_live_200_mcmc_steps_50, both datasets, 980 runs after the probe under probe-derived @2 timeouts (NSS 600 s, Zeus 1168 s); %20; submit_wave2_remainder; pin df6d218f10cd; pulled in B5b-2 — 20/20 COMPLETED (16:08-17:38 UTC); 980 remainder rows pulled by per-directory tar (20 probe rows byte-identical); all admitted under gaussian_x3@2, 0 missing; judged B5b-2 - 2026-10-15 — *run* — 408367_[0-389] finished — wall 1:57: scored wave 2 separated jax_cpu: 3750 runs, %60, afterany 408346:408347 — 390/390 COMPLETED; 3750 separated jax_cpu rows admitted; judged B5b - 2026-10-15 — *run* — 408366_[0-379] finished — wall 1:51: scored wave 2 separated numpy: 2250 runs, %60, afterany 408346:408347 — 380/380 COMPLETED; 2250 separated numpy rows admitted; judged B5b - 2026-10-15 — *run* — 408365_[0-344] finished — wall 1:46: scored wave 2 blend jax_cpu: 3500 runs, %60, afterany 408346:408347 — 345/345 COMPLETED; 3500 blend jax_cpu rows admitted; judged B5b -- 2026-10-15 — *run* — 408348_[0-379] finished — wall 1:53: scored wave 2 (gaussian_x3@2) blend numpy: 2250 runs, 50 seeds x 5 realisations, %60, afterany 408346:408347; submit_wave2_scored_gaussian_x3_blend_numpy — 380/380 COMPLETED; 2250 blend numpy rows admit… [full log](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/autofit_inference.md) -
    📋 resume autofit_inference +active · ral · [autofit_inference#8](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/autofit_inference/issues/8) -``` -Use the cortex skill. — resume autofit_inference: read PyAutoCortex projects/autofit_inference.md (Now, Runs, Log) and then /home/jammy/Code/PyAutoLabs/fit/autofit_inference/wiki/project/state.md and the assistant autofit_assistant's AGENTS.md; tell me where I left off and what I said I would do next. Submit nothing and log nothing until I say. -``` +
    -### euclid — The original Euclid DR1 grade-AB catalogue project, superseded by euclid_dr1 +
    euclid — The original Euclid DR1 grade-AB catalogue project, superseded by euclid_dr1 · dormant · no runs recorded · updated 2026-10-15 + +**Registered:** not recorded -dormant · both · no issue yet · [projects/euclid.md](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/euclid.md) · local `/mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/euclid` · RAL `/mnt/ral/jnightin/active/euclid` +**Local:** `` /mnt/c/Users/Jammy/Science/active/euclid `` -**Now** +**RAL:** `` /mnt/ral/jnightin/active/euclid `` + +**Current position** Dormant: superseded by euclid_dr1 (euclid_dr1_prelim is defunct). The tree is kept under Science/active and RAL `active/euclid` (category layout, 2026-10-15); no question is open. -**Runs** +**Runs** (0) -- _nothing on the cluster_ +_nothing on the cluster_ -**Last 5** +
    Recent log — 4 of 4 entries - 2026-10-15 — *note* — superseded by euclid_dr1 (euclid_dr1_prelim defunct) per the human; stays dormant; folder under Science/active and RAL active/; ral_root repointed to the category layout (PyAutoCortex#67) - 2026-08-28 — *note* — question: Do we recover Sersic indices or is prior pile-up artefact — planned, never run [archive/tasks/euclid/sersic_index_recovery.md] @@ -408,6 +585,12 @@ Dormant: superseded by euclid_dr1 (euclid_dr1_prelim is defunct). The tree is ke [full log](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/euclid.md) +dormant · both · no issue yet + +
    + +
    +
    5 retired - [inference_programme](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/inference_programme.md) — The first inference programme, retired and restarted as autolens_inference — retired 2026-09-07: restarting from scratch: the project setup was unsatisfactory and it informed how the Cortex manages projects; RAL outputs stashed at /mnt/ral/jnightin/inference_programme_retired_2026-09-07 diff --git a/projects/autofit_inference.md b/projects/autofit_inference.md index 331caf4..b9b7cd7 100644 --- a/projects/autofit_inference.md +++ b/projects/autofit_inference.md @@ -5,13 +5,15 @@ Issue: autofit_inference#8 ## Now -Wave 2 closed and judged under gaussian_x3@2 (B5b-2, 2026-10-15): all 12,750 pulled rows admitted at PyAutoFit pin df6d218f10cd; of the 13,000 expected runs, 11,580 rows + 1,170 failed + 0 missing + 250 deferred. The 409930 probe-first legs close: NSS 50-step leads both evidence rankings (blend 158/250, separated 210/250); Zeus JAX is 0/250 on the blend and 190/250 on the separated control (first among separated posterior legs). The catalogue ranks only legs with success rate >= 50 % over >= 20 attempts and lists the rest as unreliable (post-hoc presentation convention, protocol §8 note; autofit_inference#12 ruling 2). Summary records published as inference-summary@3 (101 record shards). Next: after the B5b-2 PRs merge, capture the Insight fit snapshot from main under @3 and run pyauto-insight check online; then B5c (a second model family). +B5c (2026-10-15, autofit_inference#14): a second model family, correlated_nd (correlated Gaussians D = 20/50/100, condition number 10^3, and a D = 20 hybrid Rosenbrock banana, exact posteriors and ln Z), pre-registered as correlated_nd@1 (first committed 9ec37795f404; amendment A1 before any row) with seeded datasets and eight exact references that pass the section 6 agreement test. Its 930-run pilot is RAL 409957 on --partition=ral at the pin df6d218f10cd; it ranks nothing and is catalogued apart from gaussian_x3 (nothing ranked across families). gaussian_x3 wave 2 stays closed and judged under gaussian_x3@2. Next: B5c-2 pulls the pilot (results/ only), judges it under @1, freezes correlated_nd@2 and submits the scored wave. ## Runs +- 409957_[0-929] — open — ral — 2026-10-15 — correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family; protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells over corr_gaussian_d20/d50/d100 + rosenbrock_d20, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100; submit_correlated_nd_pilot; pin df6d218f10cd; pulled in B5c-2 ## Log +- 2026-10-15 — run — 409957_[0-929] submitted: correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family; protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells over corr_gaussian_d20/d50/d100 + rosenbrock_d20, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100; submit_correlated_nd_pilot; pin df6d218f10cd; pulled in B5c-2 - 2026-10-15 — run — 409930_[0-19] finished — wall 1:30: wave-2 probe-first remainder (B5b): Zeus JAX + NSS n_live_200_mcmc_steps_50, both datasets, 980 runs after the probe under probe-derived @2 timeouts (NSS 600 s, Zeus 1168 s); %20; submit_wave2_remainder; pin df6d218f10cd; pulled in B5b-2 — 20/20 COMPLETED (16:08-17:38 UTC); 980 remainder rows pulled by per-directory tar (20 probe rows byte-identical); all admitted under gaussian_x3@2, 0 missing; judged B5b-2 - 2026-10-15 — run — 408367_[0-389] finished — wall 1:57: scored wave 2 separated jax_cpu: 3750 runs, %60, afterany 408346:408347 — 390/390 COMPLETED; 3750 separated jax_cpu rows admitted; judged B5b - 2026-10-15 — run — 408366_[0-379] finished — wall 1:51: scored wave 2 separated numpy: 2250 runs, %60, afterany 408346:408347 — 380/380 COMPLETED; 2250 separated numpy rows admitted; judged B5b diff --git a/state.json b/state.json index 3bff393..20ea84c 100644 --- a/state.json +++ b/state.json @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ "repo": "PyAutoCortex", "status": "yellow", "headline": "YELLOW \u2014 9 active \u00b7 22 running", - "updated": "2026-10-15T18:12:20Z", + "updated": "2026-10-15T22:26:43Z", "pages_url": "https://pyautolabs.github.io/PyAutoCortex/", "items": [ { From 06c8a34ea1971b24f662d8fbb091c645ef2cba98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jammy2211 Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 23:50:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] autofit_inference: 409957 failed at import (disturbed shared clone); pilot resubmitted as 410866 from a private copy Refs PyAutoLabs/autofit_inference#14 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 --- dashboard.html | 12 ++++++------ dashboard.md | 12 ++++++------ projects/autofit_inference.md | 6 ++++-- state.json | 2 +- 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/dashboard.html b/dashboard.html index 4409b0e..a45d26b 100644 --- a/dashboard.html +++ b/dashboard.html @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ - Open slope_hierarchy_scale: https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/slope_hierarchy_scale - Open ic50_workspace: https://github.com/Jammy2211/ic50_workspace - Open autolens_inference: https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/autolens_inference -- Open autofit_inference: https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/autofit_inference
    Last updated 2026-10-15 22:26:42 UTC
    ↻ Update

    +- Open autofit_inference: https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/autofit_inference
    Last updated 2026-10-15 22:50:47 UTC
    ↻ Update

    @@ -651,23 +651,23 @@

    Runs (6)

    RAL:
    /mnt/ral/jnightin/inference/autofit_inference

    Current position

    -

    B5c (2026-10-15, autofit_inference#14): a second model family, correlated_nd (correlated Gaussians D = 20/50/100, condition number 10^3, and a D = 20 hybrid Rosenbrock banana, exact posteriors and ln Z), pre-registered as correlated_nd@1 (first committed 9ec37795f404; amendment A1 before any row) with seeded datasets and eight exact references that pass the section 6 agreement test. Its 930-run pilot is RAL 409957 on --partition=ral at the pin df6d218f10cd; it ranks nothing and is catalogued apart from gaussian_x3 (nothing ranked across families). gaussian_x3 wave 2 stays closed and judged under gaussian_x3@2. Next: B5c-2 pulls the pilot (results/ only), judges it under @1, freezes correlated_nd@2 and submits the scored wave.

    +

    B5c (2026-10-15, autofit_inference#14): a second model family, correlated_nd (correlated Gaussians D = 20/50/100, condition number 10^3, and a D = 20 hybrid Rosenbrock banana, exact posteriors and ln Z), pre-registered as correlated_nd@1 (first committed 9ec37795f404; amendment A1 before any row) with seeded datasets and eight exact references that pass the section 6 agreement test. Its 930-run pilot is RAL 410866 (pending at hand-back; 409957 failed at import on the disturbed shared clone and was cancelled) on --partition=ral from the private copy inference/autofit_inference_b5c at the pin df6d218f10cd; it ranks nothing and is catalogued apart from gaussian_x3 (nothing ranked across families). gaussian_x3 wave 2 stays closed and judged under gaussian_x3@2. Next: B5c-2 pulls the pilot (results/ only), judges it under @1, freezes correlated_nd@2 and submits the scored wave.

    Runs (1)

    - +
    JobStatePartitionDateDescription
    409957_[0-929]openral2026-10-15
    correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family;
    protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cel…    show less

    correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family;
    protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells over corr_gaussian_d20/d50/d100 + rosenbrock_d20, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100;
    submit_correlated_nd_pilot;
    pin df6d218f10cd;
    pulled in B5c-2

    410866_[0-929]openral2026-10-15
    correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c), resubmission of 409957 from the PRIVATE copy /mnt/ral/jnightin/inference/autofit_inference_b5c (delivered files sha256-verified fr…show less

    correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c), resubmission of 409957 from the PRIVATE copy /mnt/ral/jnightin/inference/autofit_inference_b5c (delivered files sha256-verified from 245a3ef, own copy of the pin): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100;
    pin df6d218f10cd;
    pull results/ from the private copy in B5c-2
    -
    Recent log — 5 of 24 entries +
    Recent log — 5 of 26 entries
      +
    • 2026-10-15 — run —
      410866_[0-929] submitted: correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c), resubmission of 409957 from the PRIVATE copy /mnt/ral/jnightin/inference/autofit_inference_b5c (delivered files sha256-verified from 245a3ef, own copy of the pin): 930 runs, 10 seeds x…show less

      410866_[0-929] submitted: correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c), resubmission of 409957 from the PRIVATE copy /mnt/ral/jnightin/inference/autofit_inference_b5c (delivered files sha256-verified from 245a3ef, own copy of the pin): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100; pin df6d218f10cd; pull results/ from the private copy in B5c-2

      • +
    • 2026-10-15 — run —
      409957_[0-929] failed — wall 0:06: correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family; protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells over corr_gaussian_d20/d50/d100 + rosenbro…show less

      409957_[0-929] failed — wall 0:06: correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family; protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells over corr_gaussian_d20/d50/d100 + rosenbrock_d20, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100; submit_correlated_nd_pilot; pin df6d218f10cd; pulled in B5c-2 — every task failed at import (ModuleNotFoundError _autofit_inference_cli): the shared RAL clone had been switched to an old main by another session (stash pre-main-switch 19:24 UTC) and lost the CLI and config/ as the array started; 800 tasks exited, the rest scancelled; no row written; resubmitted from the private copy inference/autofit_inference_b5c as 410866

    • 2026-10-15 — run —
      409957_[0-929] submitted: correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family; protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells over corr_gaussian_d20/d50/d100 + rosenbrock_d20, o…show less

      409957_[0-929] submitted: correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family; protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells over corr_gaussian_d20/d50/d100 + rosenbrock_d20, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100; submit_correlated_nd_pilot; pin df6d218f10cd; pulled in B5c-2

    • 2026-10-15 — run —
      409930_[0-19] finished — wall 1:30: wave-2 probe-first remainder (B5b): Zeus JAX + NSS n_live_200_mcmc_steps_50, both datasets, 980 runs after the probe under probe-derived @2 timeouts (NSS 600 s, Zeus 1168 s); %20; submit_wave2_remainder;…show less

      409930_[0-19] finished — wall 1:30: wave-2 probe-first remainder (B5b): Zeus JAX + NSS n_live_200_mcmc_steps_50, both datasets, 980 runs after the probe under probe-derived @2 timeouts (NSS 600 s, Zeus 1168 s); %20; submit_wave2_remainder; pin df6d218f10cd; pulled in B5b-2 — 20/20 COMPLETED (16:08-17:38 UTC); 980 remainder rows pulled by per-directory tar (20 probe rows byte-identical); all admitted under gaussian_x3@2, 0 missing; judged B5b-2

    • 2026-10-15 — run — 408367_[0-389] finished — wall 1:57: scored wave 2 separated jax_cpu: 3750 runs, %60, afterany 408346:408347 — 390/390 COMPLETED; 3750 separated jax_cpu rows admitted; judged B5b
      • -
    • 2026-10-15 — run — 408366_[0-379] finished — wall 1:51: scored wave 2 separated numpy: 2250 runs, %60, afterany 408346:408347 — 380/380 COMPLETED; 2250 separated numpy rows admitted; judged B5b
      • -
    • 2026-10-15 — run — 408365_[0-344] finished — wall 1:46: scored wave 2 blend jax_cpu: 3500 runs, %60, afterany 408346:408347 — 345/345 COMPLETED; 3500 blend jax_cpu rows admitted; judged B5b

    full log

    active · ral · autofit_inference#8

    diff --git a/dashboard.md b/dashboard.md index d7f783c..87ee053 100644 --- a/dashboard.md +++ b/dashboard.md @@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ active · both · [autolens_inference#4](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/autolens_ **Current position** -B5c (2026-10-15, autofit_inference#14): a second model family, correlated_nd (correlated Gaussians D = 20/50/100, condition number 10^3, and a D = 20 hybrid Rosenbrock banana, exact posteriors and ln Z), pre-registered as correlated_nd@1 (first committed 9ec37795f404; amendment A1 before any row) with seeded datasets and eight exact references that pass the section 6 agreement test. Its 930-run pilot is RAL 409957 on --partition=ral at the pin df6d218f10cd; it ranks nothing and is catalogued apart from gaussian_x3 (nothing ranked across families). gaussian_x3 wave 2 stays closed and judged under gaussian_x3@2. Next: B5c-2 pulls the pilot (results/ only), judges it under @1, freezes correlated_nd@2 and submits the scored wave. +B5c (2026-10-15, autofit_inference#14): a second model family, correlated_nd (correlated Gaussians D = 20/50/100, condition number 10^3, and a D = 20 hybrid Rosenbrock banana, exact posteriors and ln Z), pre-registered as correlated_nd@1 (first committed 9ec37795f404; amendment A1 before any row) with seeded datasets and eight exact references that pass the section 6 agreement test. Its 930-run pilot is RAL 410866 (pending at hand-back; 409957 failed at import on the disturbed shared clone and was cancelled) on --partition=ral from the private copy inference/autofit_inference_b5c at the pin df6d218f10cd; it ranks nothing and is catalogued apart from gaussian_x3 (nothing ranked across families). gaussian_x3 wave 2 stays closed and judged under gaussian_x3@2. Next: B5c-2 pulls the pilot (results/ only), judges it under @1, freezes correlated_nd@2 and submits the scored wave.
    📋 @@ -536,21 +536,21 @@ Use the cortex skill. — resume autofit_inference: read PyAutoCortex projects/a | Job | State | Partition | Date | Description | |---|---|---|---|---| -| `409957_[0-929]` | open | ral | 2026-10-15 | correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family; protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cel… | +| `410866_[0-929]` | open | ral | 2026-10-15 | correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c), resubmission of 409957 from the PRIVATE copy /mnt/ral/jnightin/inference/autofit_inference_b5c (delivered files sha256-verified fr… |
    Full descriptions (1 shortened above) -- `409957_[0-929]` — correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family; protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells over corr_gaussian_d20/d50/d100 + rosenbrock_d20, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100; submit_correlated_nd_pilot; pin df6d218f10cd; pulled in B5c-2 +- `410866_[0-929]` — correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c), resubmission of 409957 from the PRIVATE copy /mnt/ral/jnightin/inference/autofit_inference_b5c (delivered files sha256-verified from 245a3ef, own copy of the pin): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100; pin df6d218f10cd; pull results/ from the private copy in B5c-2
    -
    Recent log — 5 of 24 entries +
    Recent log — 5 of 26 entries +- 2026-10-15 — *run* — 410866_[0-929] submitted: correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c), resubmission of 409957 from the PRIVATE copy /mnt/ral/jnightin/inference/autofit_inference_b5c (delivered files sha256-verified from 245a3ef, own copy of the pin): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100; pin df6d218f10cd; pull results/ from the private copy in B5c-2 +- 2026-10-15 — *run* — 409957_[0-929] failed — wall 0:06: correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family; protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells over corr_gaussian_d20/d50/d100 + rosenbrock_d20, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100; submit_correlated_nd_pilot; pin df6d218f10cd; pulled in B5c-2 — every task failed at import (ModuleNotFoundError _autofit_inference_cli): the shared RAL clone had been switched to an old main by another session (stash pre-main-switch 19:24 UTC) and lost the CLI and config/ as the array started; 800 tasks exited, the rest scancelled; no row written; resubmitted from the private copy inference/autofit_inference_b5c as 410866 - 2026-10-15 — *run* — 409957_[0-929] submitted: correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family; protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells over corr_gaussian_d20/d50/d100 + rosenbrock_d20, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100; submit_correlated_nd_pilot; pin df6d218f10cd; pulled in B5c-2 - 2026-10-15 — *run* — 409930_[0-19] finished — wall 1:30: wave-2 probe-first remainder (B5b): Zeus JAX + NSS n_live_200_mcmc_steps_50, both datasets, 980 runs after the probe under probe-derived @2 timeouts (NSS 600 s, Zeus 1168 s); %20; submit_wave2_remainder; pin df6d218f10cd; pulled in B5b-2 — 20/20 COMPLETED (16:08-17:38 UTC); 980 remainder rows pulled by per-directory tar (20 probe rows byte-identical); all admitted under gaussian_x3@2, 0 missing; judged B5b-2 - 2026-10-15 — *run* — 408367_[0-389] finished — wall 1:57: scored wave 2 separated jax_cpu: 3750 runs, %60, afterany 408346:408347 — 390/390 COMPLETED; 3750 separated jax_cpu rows admitted; judged B5b -- 2026-10-15 — *run* — 408366_[0-379] finished — wall 1:51: scored wave 2 separated numpy: 2250 runs, %60, afterany 408346:408347 — 380/380 COMPLETED; 2250 separated numpy rows admitted; judged B5b -- 2026-10-15 — *run* — 408365_[0-344] finished — wall 1:46: scored wave 2 blend jax_cpu: 3500 runs, %60, afterany 408346:408347 — 345/345 COMPLETED; 3500 blend jax_cpu rows admitted; judged B5b [full log](https://github.com/PyAutoLabs/PyAutoCortex/blob/main/projects/autofit_inference.md) diff --git a/projects/autofit_inference.md b/projects/autofit_inference.md index b9b7cd7..eafbf51 100644 --- a/projects/autofit_inference.md +++ b/projects/autofit_inference.md @@ -5,14 +5,16 @@ Issue: autofit_inference#8 ## Now -B5c (2026-10-15, autofit_inference#14): a second model family, correlated_nd (correlated Gaussians D = 20/50/100, condition number 10^3, and a D = 20 hybrid Rosenbrock banana, exact posteriors and ln Z), pre-registered as correlated_nd@1 (first committed 9ec37795f404; amendment A1 before any row) with seeded datasets and eight exact references that pass the section 6 agreement test. Its 930-run pilot is RAL 409957 on --partition=ral at the pin df6d218f10cd; it ranks nothing and is catalogued apart from gaussian_x3 (nothing ranked across families). gaussian_x3 wave 2 stays closed and judged under gaussian_x3@2. Next: B5c-2 pulls the pilot (results/ only), judges it under @1, freezes correlated_nd@2 and submits the scored wave. +B5c (2026-10-15, autofit_inference#14): a second model family, correlated_nd (correlated Gaussians D = 20/50/100, condition number 10^3, and a D = 20 hybrid Rosenbrock banana, exact posteriors and ln Z), pre-registered as correlated_nd@1 (first committed 9ec37795f404; amendment A1 before any row) with seeded datasets and eight exact references that pass the section 6 agreement test. Its 930-run pilot is RAL 410866 (pending at hand-back; 409957 failed at import on the disturbed shared clone and was cancelled) on --partition=ral from the private copy inference/autofit_inference_b5c at the pin df6d218f10cd; it ranks nothing and is catalogued apart from gaussian_x3 (nothing ranked across families). gaussian_x3 wave 2 stays closed and judged under gaussian_x3@2. Next: B5c-2 pulls the pilot (results/ only), judges it under @1, freezes correlated_nd@2 and submits the scored wave. ## Runs -- 409957_[0-929] — open — ral — 2026-10-15 — correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family; protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells over corr_gaussian_d20/d50/d100 + rosenbrock_d20, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100; submit_correlated_nd_pilot; pin df6d218f10cd; pulled in B5c-2 +- 410866_[0-929] — open — ral — 2026-10-15 — correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c), resubmission of 409957 from the PRIVATE copy /mnt/ral/jnightin/inference/autofit_inference_b5c (delivered files sha256-verified from 245a3ef, own copy of the pin): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100; pin df6d218f10cd; pull results/ from the private copy in B5c-2 ## Log +- 2026-10-15 — run — 410866_[0-929] submitted: correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c), resubmission of 409957 from the PRIVATE copy /mnt/ral/jnightin/inference/autofit_inference_b5c (delivered files sha256-verified from 245a3ef, own copy of the pin): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100; pin df6d218f10cd; pull results/ from the private copy in B5c-2 +- 2026-10-15 — run — 409957_[0-929] failed — wall 0:06: correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family; protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells over corr_gaussian_d20/d50/d100 + rosenbrock_d20, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100; submit_correlated_nd_pilot; pin df6d218f10cd; pulled in B5c-2 — every task failed at import (ModuleNotFoundError _autofit_inference_cli): the shared RAL clone had been switched to an old main by another session (stash pre-main-switch 19:24 UTC) and lost the CLI and config/ as the array started; 800 tasks exited, the rest scancelled; no row written; resubmitted from the private copy inference/autofit_inference_b5c as 410866 - 2026-10-15 — run — 409957_[0-929] submitted: correlated_nd@1 pilot (B5c, second model family; protocol first committed 9ec37795f404, A1 before any row): 930 runs, 10 seeds x realisation 1 x 93 planned cells over corr_gaussian_d20/d50/d100 + rosenbrock_d20, one run per task, 4 h process cap, %100; submit_correlated_nd_pilot; pin df6d218f10cd; pulled in B5c-2 - 2026-10-15 — run — 409930_[0-19] finished — wall 1:30: wave-2 probe-first remainder (B5b): Zeus JAX + NSS n_live_200_mcmc_steps_50, both datasets, 980 runs after the probe under probe-derived @2 timeouts (NSS 600 s, Zeus 1168 s); %20; submit_wave2_remainder; pin df6d218f10cd; pulled in B5b-2 — 20/20 COMPLETED (16:08-17:38 UTC); 980 remainder rows pulled by per-directory tar (20 probe rows byte-identical); all admitted under gaussian_x3@2, 0 missing; judged B5b-2 - 2026-10-15 — run — 408367_[0-389] finished — wall 1:57: scored wave 2 separated jax_cpu: 3750 runs, %60, afterany 408346:408347 — 390/390 COMPLETED; 3750 separated jax_cpu rows admitted; judged B5b diff --git a/state.json b/state.json index 20ea84c..3b117db 100644 --- a/state.json +++ b/state.json @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ "repo": "PyAutoCortex", "status": "yellow", "headline": "YELLOW \u2014 9 active \u00b7 22 running", - "updated": "2026-10-15T22:26:43Z", + "updated": "2026-10-15T22:50:47Z", "pages_url": "https://pyautolabs.github.io/PyAutoCortex/", "items": [ { From f3962b273ea1516367c38132a3a562cf175b8ba0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jammy2211 Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 11:04:56 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] autofit_inference: pilot 410866 finished 2026-10-16 (926/930, 4 OOM at 8 G) Run leaves ## Runs via cortex done (wall 4:16); the four OUT_OF_MEMORY tasks (263, 273, 304, 383, all corr_gaussian_d50) carry to B5c-2; results unpulled in the private copy. Now/Next updated; dashboard re-rendered with --cortex . Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 --- dashboard.html | 27 +++++++++++---------------- dashboard.md | 28 ++++++++++------------------ projects/autofit_inference.md | 4 ++-- state.json | 2 +- 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/dashboard.html b/dashboard.html index 6fc2076..6503db1 100644 --- a/dashboard.html +++ b/dashboard.html @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ PyAutoCortex Dashboard - +